Die Entwicklung der Anden – Teil 2: Hebung und … › staff › hve › skripte › Anden...-...
Transcript of Die Entwicklung der Anden – Teil 2: Hebung und … › staff › hve › skripte › Anden...-...
1
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Modul Regionale Geologie (600156)WiSe 12/13
TM1 – Regionale Geologie ausgewählter Gebiete der Erde
Die Entwicklung der Anden – Teil 2:Hebung und Erosion
Hilmar von EynattenAbt. Sedimentologie/Umweltgeologie
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
What controls crustal thickening and uplift ?
- convergence Nazca/ SA plates- W-drift of South America- dip of subducted slab
- subduction erosion- upper-plate shortening- climate
Jaillard et al. 2002, Tectonophysics
what else…?
2
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Hoke & Garzione 2008, EPSL
Garzione et al. 2006, 2008: only the removal of dense eclogitic lower crust and mantle litho-sphere can generate uplift of such magnitudeand rapidity (i.e. ~3 km from ~10 to ~7 Ma)
shortening-thickening relation strongly variesalong orogenic strike; contribution of tectoniccontraction to crustal thickening may be as lowas 30% (e.g. Kley and Monaldi 1998)
Mamani et al. 2010: geochemical variation of magmatism in space and time support continuedcrustal thickening; i.e. no delamination, insteadshortening plus lower crust flow from areas of excess shortening to areas with low shortening; (Husson & Semperé 2003; Hartley et al. 2007)
→ additional mechanisms are required, such as:♦ magmatic addition/ basaltic underplating♦ lateral mass movement in the upper crust as
well as lower to mid crustal flow♦ delamination of dense lower crust/ upper m.
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
timing and mechanism(s) of uplift and crustalthickening in the Central Andes (15.5 – 20°S)
• ~45-25 Ma: onset of crustal shortening, thickening,and surface uplift
• 26-22 Ma: onset of voluminousmagmatic activity (16-19°S)
• ~10 Ma: major uplift phase inthe Late Miocene Oncken et al., 2006
elevations up to ~ 6 km, plateau-likeorogen (>4 km) at the leading edge of SA, up to 70 km thick crust, continuoussubduction since at least the Jurassic
Motivation:
3
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
W E
km ~21°SElger et al. 2005, Tectonics
?
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Approach:
Voigt et al. 2008
example 2: Late Miocene to Pliocene uplift & canyonincision, Western Flank, S-Peru
example 2: Late Eocene to Oligocene uplift & provenance change, Western Flank, N-Chile
example 3: Late Miocene to Pliocene uplift/ deformation vs. accumulation rates, Subandean Range/ Foreland, S-Bolivia
4
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
sediment samples & potential source rocks
HM single-graingeochemistry
detrital zircon U/Pb geochronology
heavy mineral petrography
detrital zircon FT thermochronology
timing of Andean uplift large-scale processes
provenance model
cf. A. Decou
Approach:(example-1)
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Decou 2011 (modified fromSempere et al. 2002 and INGEMMET)
Setting:CoastalCordillera
Western Cordillera
Moquegua forearc basin
500 m of sedimentin ~50 Ma
5
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Wotzlaw et al. 2011, Terra Nova
north
ern
Chi
le –
Bol
ivia
/ 18-
19°S
Corquesyncline
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
active arcBMC
Wotzlaw et al. 2011
W E
Mesozoic
Mesozoic HM: zircon, tourmaline, rutile + apa (no garnet !)
Azapa-Fm (Olig.) HM: epidote, hornblende, pyroxene + grt, zrc, rt, tou
Azurita-Fm (Olig.) HM: garnet + zrc, apa, px, hbl, (tou)WA
6
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Victor et al. 2004, Tectonics
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Wotzlaw et al. 2011 (simplified after Kohler 1999 and Horton et al. 2001)
<30 Ma
23 Ma
Azapa Fm.Azapa Fm.
~10 Ma
23-24 Ma
20 Ma
20 Ma
~35 Ma
7
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Wotzlaw et al. 2011
tourmalinegeochemistry
→ tourmaline is derived almost exclusively from recycling of Mesozoic sediments
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Wotzlaw et al. 2011
→ garnet reveals mixed provenance for the Azapa-Fm (forearc) from the BMC as well as magmatic rocks (and their contact aureoles);
and local/regional pro-venance for the Azurita-Fm. from Uyaraniequivalent basement
garnetgeochemistry
8
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Wotzlaw et al. 2011
rutile geochemistry
→ rutile from Azapa-Fm.underlines significant contribution from BMC (in addition to recycling of Mesozoic siliciclastics)
BMCpeak-T
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Wotzlaw et al. 2011
zircon U/Pb geochronology
→Azapa-Fm U/Pb ages reveal mainly erosion of Mesozoic substratum including Toquepala arc intrusives plus minor Eocene/early Oligocene volcanism;
while Azurita-Fmzircons yield exclusively Grenville-Sunsas ages (1.0-1.2 Ga) reflecting local Uyarani-type basement
9
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Wot
zlaw
2009
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Jurassic – Early Cretaceous
Late Cretaceous – PaleogeneWotzlaw et al. 2011, Terra Nova
10
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Late Eocene
Early-Middle EoceneEocene arc volcanism (lower Lupica Fm.?)
Oligocene
Wotzlaw et al. 2011
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Victor et al. 2004, Tectonics
11
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Sch
ildge
net
al.
2007
, Geo
logy
example 2: canyon incision, S-Peru
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Schildgen et al. 2007, Geology
Cotahuasi-Ocona Canyon
12
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
1 km, 60-9 Ma: ~0.02 mm/a
1 km, 9-5 Ma: ~0.25 mm/a
after 5 Ma to ~2 Ma: ~0.5 mm/a
Schildgen et al. 2007, Geology
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
example 3: Foreland basinSubandean Ranges, S-Bolivia
13
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13Uba et al. 2009, EPSL
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13Uba et al., 2009, EPSL
14
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Uba et al. 2009, EPSL
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13Uba et al., 2009, EPSL
15
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Jaillard et al. 2002, Tectonophysics
Late Miocene to Pliocene uplift & canyon incision starting at ~9 Ma, mainly relatedto warping of the western margin of the Andean plateau (Western Flank, S-Peru)
Late Eocene to Oligocene uplift & provenancechange, establishment of an effective E-W drainage divide, mainly related to upper crustal shortening (Western Flank, N-Chile & S-Peru)
Late Miocene (~ 12 to 6 Ma) pulse in shortening, foreland propagation, and
sedimentation rates (Subandean Range/ Foreland basin, S-Bolivia)
HvE – Regionale Geologie – WS 12/13
Decou A, von Eynatten H, Mamani M, Sempere T, Wörner G (2011): Cenozoic forearcbasin sediments in Southern Peru (15-18°S): Stratigraphic and heavy mineral constraints for Eocene to Miocene evolution of the Central Andes. Sedimentary Geology, 237, 55-72.
Wotzlaw JF, Decou A, von Eynatten H, Wörner G , Frei D (2011): Jurassic to Paleogenetectono-magmatic evolution of northern Chile and adjacent Bolivia from detrital zircon U-Pbgeochronology and heavy mineral provenance. Terra Nova, 23(6), 399-406 .
References:
Jaillard E, Herail G, Monfret T, Wörner G (2002): Andean geodynamics: main issues and contributions from the 4th ISAG, Göttingen. Tectonophysics, 345, 1-15.
Uba CE, Kley J, Strecker MR, Schmitt AK (2009): Unsteady evolution of the Bolivian Subandean thrust belt: The role of enhanced erosion and clastic wedge progradation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 281, 134-146.
Schildgen TF, Hodges KV, Whipple KX, Reiners, Pringle MS (2007): Uplift of the western margin of the Andean plateau revealed from canyon incision history, southern Peru. Geology, 35, 523-526.