HILF Study

19
High-Impact, Low-Frequency Event Risk to the North American Bulk Power System Gerry Cauley, President and CEO, NERC Mark Lauby, Director, Reliability Assessments and Performance Analysis, NERC Industry Briefing | June 2, 2010

description

Study for North American Electric Reliability Corporationn (NERC): "High Impact, Low Frequency Event Risk to the North American Bulk Power Supply," June 2010

Transcript of HILF Study

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    1/19

    High-Impact, Low-Frequency Event Risk tothe North American Bulk Power System

    Gerry Cauley, President and CEO, NERC

    Mark Lauby, Director, Reliability Assessments andPerformance Analysis, NERC

    Industry Briefing | June 2, 2010

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    2/19

    About NERC

    Develop & enforce reliability standards

    Analyze system outages and near-misses& recommend improved practices

    Assess current and future reliability

    International regulatory authority for electricreliability in North America

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    3/19

    North Americas Critical Infrastructure

    North Americas bulk power system is one of our mostcritical infrastructures; it underpins our government,economy and society in many important ways

    Comprised of over 200,000 miles of transmission lines,

    thousands of generating plants, and millions of digitalcontrols

    Electric sector has a long history of successfullymanaging day-to-day reliability risk

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    4/19

    Managing Risk

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    5/19

    High-Impact, Low-Frequency (HILF) Risks

    Black Swan events

    Occur very infrequently, or, in somecases, have never occurred

    Little real-world operationalexperience with addressing theserisks

    Generally have the potential to

    impact many assets at once Catastrophic impacts on the bulk

    power system and society-at-large

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    6/19

    Examples of Ongoing Public/Private Effortsto Address HILF Risks

    Year Effort

    2009 NERC Pandemic Influenza Working Group coordinates withgovernment authorities to provide guidance to the electric sectoron the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic

    July 1 First requirements of NERCs Critical InfrastructureProtection Standards become mandatory and enforceable acrossthe U.S.

    2008 U.S. EMP Commission issues summary report onElectromagnetic Pulse risk to civilian infrastructure

    National Academy of Sciences releases report on Geo-magneticDisturbances

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    7/19

    NERC/DOE Joint HILF Effort

    Partnered in July 2009

    Formed Steering Committee

    Conducted Workshop inNovember 2009

    110 Subject Matter Experts,including DOD, DHS, FERC,

    Congressional staff, intelligencecommunity, EMP Commission,all sectors of the electric industry

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    8/19

    Todays Report

    Summary of November workshop

    Creates a common understandingof three HILF risks

    Segmented analysis of threat,vulnerability, and consequence

    Lays the groundwork for the

    development of an action plan

    19 Proposals for Action suggested byworkshop participants

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    9/19

    Three Principal HILF Risks

    Coordinated Cyber, Physical, and BlendedAttacks

    Pandemics

    Geomagnetic Disturbances (GMD),Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP), and IntentionalElectromagnetic Interference (IEMI)

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    10/19

    Common Framework Approach to HILF Risk

    Sound Risk Management Must Take Holistic, Sector-Wide Approach

    Impossible to fully protect the grid from all threats. Cannot gold plate the system.

    Must focus on balance of resilience, restoration, and protection.

    Key Interdependencies Must Be Identified and Understood

    Electric sector highly dependent on telecommunications and fuel supply and deliveryinfrastructure.

    HILF Risk Must be Placed In Context

    HILF Risks are part of a larger risk landscape facing the sector. Many competingpriorities strain available resources: smart grid implementation, climate change

    HILF Risk Differs from Traditional RisksRequires risk managers to take a different approach to handling these risks.

    Public/Private Partnership Critical to Progress

    More effective public private partnership must include better information sharing,coordinated R&D, and clearer risk indicators.

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    11/19

    Coordinated Attack Risk

    Concerted, well-planned attack against multiplekey nodes

    Potential for cyber attacker to manipulate keysystems and provide misleading information tosystem operators

    Adaptive attack could actively attempt to thwart

    responders efforts to restore power

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    12/19

    Coordinated Attack RiskKey Proposals for Action

    More effective information sharing betweengovernment and industry on specific threats andvulnerabilities

    Consider traditional system planning andoperating practices with respect to coordinatedattack threats

    Research and development to create forensictools for industrial control systems (i.e. SCADA)

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    13/19

    Pandemic Risk

    People Event

    Potential loss of significantportion of workforce neededto reliably operate the powersystem

    2009 A/H1N1 outbreak a

    mild event and did not exhibitthe characteristics of mostconcern to the electric sector

    Hospitals are overrun during the1918 Pandemic

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    14/19

    Pandemic RiskKey Proposals for Action

    Electric sector entities should review pandemicplans to incorporate lessons learned from 2009

    A/H1N1 event

    Pandemic severity scale should be created tobetter track societal impacts

    Better leading indicators should be developed

    and communicated to businesses during apandemic outbreak

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    15/19

    Geomagnetic Disturbance Risk

    Earthly effects of solar weather

    Geomagnetically-induced currents can causewidespread tripping of high-voltagetransmission lines

    Potential for lastingdamage to high-voltage

    transformers

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    16/19

    Geomagnetic Disturbance RiskKey Proposals for Action

    Existing measurement index for strength ofgeomagnetic disturbances (K-index) should beimproved

    Spare equipment database for high-voltagetransformers should be considered

    Evaluate and recommend cost-effective and

    efficient mitigations

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    17/19

    Electromagnetic Pulse and IntentionalElectromagnetic Interference Risk

    High-Altitude detonation of a nuclear weaponwould simultaneously interrupt and potentiallydamage many system components

    Intentional Electromagnetic Interference, ifcoordinated, could result in local disruptions tomultiple key nodes

    l l d l

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    18/19

    Electromagnetic Pulse and IntentionalElectromagnetic Interference RiskKey Proposals for Action

    Identify and prioritize top ten mitigations thatare both cost effective and sufficient to protectthe system

    Spare equipment database for high-voltagetransformers should be considered

    Long-term R&D roadmap

  • 5/20/2018 HILF Study

    19/19

    Question & Answer

    Contact:

    Janet SenaDirector, Government [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]