Katalytisch aktive Materialien für (de)zentrale ...
Transcript of Katalytisch aktive Materialien für (de)zentrale ...
Leibniz-Institut für Katalyse e.V.
LIKAT Rostock
„Katalytisch aktive Materialien für (de)zentrale Energiespeichertechniken“
Henrik Junge
Konferenz des Leibniz-Forschungsverbundes Energiewende Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 2
LIKAT: Yesterday and Today
Leibniz – Institut für Katalyse: Know How in Catalysis
„Das Institut erbringt ganz überwiegend exzellente, international hoch anerkannte Leistungen auf einem sowohl wissenschaftlich interessanten als auch gesellschaftlich und ökonomisch hoch bedeutsamen Gebiet. Es ist inhaltlich überzeugend und zukunftsorientiert aufgestellt, indem es seine Arbeiten an langfristig tragfähigen Problemstellungen orientiert.“ 2009 - Gutachterkommission nach einer intensiven Evaluierung des LIKAT
History
1952 founded as first research institute for catalysis in Europe 1959 Separation in two institutes (later IfOK and ACA) 2003 Integration of IfOK into the Leibniz-Society 2006 Merger of IfOK and ACA to LIKAT which is today the largest non-profit research institute on applied catalysis
Status
31.12.2014: 302 co-workers 271 publications in 2014 basic funding ca. 10.8 Mio € external funding 7.4 Mio €
Prof. Rienecker Prof. Langenbeck
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
Challenges for the 21st Century ─
Top 10 of mankind‘s global problems*
1. Energy
2. Water
3. Food
4. Environment
5. Poverty
6. Terrorism and war
7. Diseases
8. Education
9. Demokracy
10. Population
Energy issues are primary:
Problems 2-9 are dependent directly or indirectly by energy!
*Richard. E. Smalley, MRS-Bulletin 2005, 30, 412-417.
Nobleprice-winner Chemistry 1996 (together with Robert F. Curl Jr. and Sir Harold Kroto)
Catalysis - science of acceleration of chemical reactions - is a
key technology for the fields of energy and environmental protection
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016 3
LIKAT Rostock
“Catalysis for Energy” at LIKAT in Rostock
1
1,008
4
Actual sources of Hydrogen: Steam Reforming of natural gas (48%),
Refinery- and chemical off gases (30%), coal gasification (18%), Electrolyses of water (4%)
Hydrogen storage in liquid chemical compounds (formic acid, methanol…)
Continious hydrogen generation with Ru- and Fe-based catalysts up to 47 L h-1
<10 ppm CO TON > 106, TOF 47000 h-1
e.g. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, Science 2011 and EES 2012
Design of heterogeneous catalysts
Fuel cell catalysts for special appli-cations (e.g. deep sea)
Hydrogenation and oxidation catalysts
e.g. Science 2013 and Nat. Prot. 2015
„Sun Fuels“ by photocatalytic water cleavage and CO2 reduction
e.g. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009 and 2013, ChemCatChem 2015
Hydrogen Genera- tion from alcohols, sugars and biomass
biomass or its fermentation products as feedstock mild conditions, low CO content
e.g. Nature 2013 and Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013
BOCKRIS Hydrogen Society
ASINGER/OLAH MeOH Economy
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
„Energiewende“ – Storage of fluctuating energy
5
http://www.itm-power.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Cleantech-Investor-Energy-Storage-15mins.pdf (11.08.2014).
Renewable power / energy (wind, solar, biomass) 2013 in
Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania: 0.95 GW / 8.3 TWh
Annual consumption: 7 TWh; daily: 0.45 – 1.1 GW
Expected necessary storage capacity in Germany:
18 GW / 7.5 TWh (2050)
Power-to-Liquid
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
Energy storage based on H2 and CO2
H2 HCOOH CH3OH CH4
H2O
½ O2
CO2 2 H2
H2O
H2
H2O
H2 storage efficiency
[%]
100 66.7 50
energy content [kWh/kg]/[kWh/L]
1.45/1.76 5.47/4.44 13.9/9.97x10-3
CO
energy- storage
base material for chemical industry
fuel
methanol economy
syngas (Fischer Tropsch) base material
for chemical industry (ethylen, propylen…)
energy storage
fuel additive (MTBE)
energy storage (natural gas
net)
energy storage (water gas shift reaction)
H2O
33.33/ 2.72x10-3
6 Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
Outline
Power to X: Hydrogen, formic acid and methanol
State of the art (available technologies)
New technologies (lab scale/still under development)
Examples from own research
Conclusion: Outlook, influence and timeline
7 Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
„Dream Reaction“ ─ Catalytic Water Cleavage
DG° = +238 kJ mol-1
DH° = +286 kJ mol-1
2500°C
1.23 eV 1/2
„I believe that one day hydrogen and oxygen, which are the components of water, can be used as a never ending source of heat and light; much better than coal. … Water will be the coal of the future.“ Jules Verne, The Secret Island (1874)
8
LIKAT Rostock
Benchmark for Renewable Hydrogen
Utsira, Norway
Energy efficiency:
Electrolysis: >70% Si-photovoltaics: <20% Org.-photovoltaics: <10%
Threshold*: 10% Lab scale*: 22.4%
*L. Spiccia et al. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2791: Perowskite PV cell, concentrated solar light (100 suns), Ni foam as electrodes
9
LIKAT Rostock 10
State of the Art in Germany: Renewable Hydrogen
>30 pilot plants in Germany combining wind power, Electrolysis and/or Sabatier (built and planned)
World first hybrid power plant by ENERTRAG in Prenzlau, Brandenburg
the grid
3 windparks (each ~2000 kW)
500 kW electrolyzer 120 Nm³/h H2
30 bar pressure
H2
storage (H2+biogas)
1350 kg H2 max 30 bar pressure
1000 kW biogas
block heating station
400 kW
block heating station
350 kW (70% H2 max.)
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
Simple models for Hydrogenases
grün: i:\Promotion\Experimentelles\Messdaten\GC\09_08\FG01-321\FG01-321.FG3
blau: i:\Promotion\Experimentelles\Messdaten\GC\09_08\FG01-304\FG01-304.FG3
[ h ]
43210
[ m
l ]
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
light on light off
F. Gärtner, S. Basker, A. Surkus, A. Boddien, H. Junge, B. Loeges, P. Dixneuf, M. Beller,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9962.
In D2O experiments D2 is formed instead of H2 (water as hydrogen source)
Conditions: 7.5 μmol Ir, 18.3 μmol Fe, 10 mL TEA/H2O/THF = 1/1/4, 25 °C.
H2
D2
Dr. F. Gärtner
12 Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
The Iridium/Iron water reduction cascade
2nd generation: Up to 4550 turn over numbers for Ir-PS and 2770 for Fe-WRC + Phosphin
Quantum Yield: up to 48 % at 415 nm (SR: Triethylamine)
a) F. Gärtner, B. Sundararaju, A.-E. Surkus, A. Boddien, B.Loges,H. Junge, P. H. Dixneuf, M. Beller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9962. b) F. Gärtner, A. Boddien, E. Barsch, K. Fumino, S. Losse, H. Junge, D. Hollmann, A. Brückner, R. Ludwig, M. Beller, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 6425; c) F. Gärtner, D. Cozzula, S. Losse, A. Boddien, G. Anilkumar, H. Junge, T. Schulz, N. Marquet, A. Spannenberg, S. Gladiali, M. Beller Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 6998; d) D. Hollmann, F. Gärtner, R Ludwig, E. Barsch, H. Junge, M. Blug, S. Hoch, M. Beller, A. Brückner; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50; 10246; e) F. Gärtner, St. Denurra, S. Losse, A. Neubauer, A. Boddien, A. Gopinathan, A. Spannenberg, H. Junge, S. Lochbrunner, M. Blug, S. Hoch, J. Busse, S. Gladiali, M. Beller, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 3220.
Dr. D. Cozzula Dr. F. Gärtner
13
LIKAT Rostock
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
22000
24000
Pt
Co
Fe
Rh
Dyads
Ni
TO
N
Performance of Water Reduction Catalysts
Fe: 200 (2009)
Fe: 2770 (2011)
metal
CHm
blankobs
metaln
V
VV
TON
25,,
.
2
TON =
Turn Over Number
metal
hydrogen
metaln
nTON
Fe: 22200 (2013)
Zeng et al. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5631
14 Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
Pt
Co
Fe
Rh
Ni
Cu
Dyads
TO
N
Performance of Water Reduction Catalysts
Increase by four orders of magnitude for Ni and by three orders for Fe and Co within the last 6-8 years!
metal
CHm
blankobs
metaln
V
VV
TON
25,,
.
2
TON =
Turn Over Number
metal
hydrogen
metaln
nTON
Ni: 280000 (2015)
15
Eisenberg et al. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1397
(X = CH, N)
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
Mode of operation
16 Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
D. Hollmann, F. Gärtner, R. Ludwig, E. Barsch, H. Junge, M. Blug, S. Hoch, M. Beller, A. Brückner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10246; “Hot paper”
time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy and DFT: A. Neubauer, G. Grell, A. Friedrich, S. Bokarev, P. Schwarzbach, F. Gärtner, A.-E. Surkus, H. Junge, M. Beller, O. Kühn, S. Lochbrunner, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2014, 5, 1355.
LIKAT Rostock
From Sacrificial Reagents to Overall Water Splitting
Lewis and Nocera Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 15729 and 2007, 104, 20142.
Photoelectrochemical Cell Artificial Leaf
Domen et al. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 2010, 49, 4096.
Semiconductors with appropriate band gap
Kudo et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 5441.
Tandem cells
C.A. Grimes, Light, Water & Hydrogen, 2008, Springer; X. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2010, 6503; K. Domen, ChemCatChem, 2012, 1485
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016 17
LIKAT Rostock
From Sacrificial Reagents to Overall Water Splitting
Domen et al. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 2010, 49, 4096.
Semiconductors with appropriate band gap
Kudo et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 5441.
Tandem cells
Photoelectrochemical Cell: Development of photoelectrode materials
L. Sun et al., Chem. Comm. 2010, 46, 7307. (TON 16)
C.J. Pickett et al., Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 1618. (stable for 1 h)
dye/catalyst/
semiconductor/
TCO/glass or metal
assemblies
oxidation reduction
18
LIKAT Rostock
Nocera, Science 2011, 334, 645.
(eff.: 2.5% wireless, 4.7% wired)
.
Photoelectrochemical Cell
Artificial Leaf
Domen et al. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 2010, 49, 4096.
Semiconductors with appropriate band gap
Kudo et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 5441.
Tandem cells
C.A. Grimes, Light, Water & Hydrogen, 2008, Springer; X. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2010, 6503; K. Domen, ChemCatChem, 2012, 1485
From Sacrificial Reagents to Overall Water Splitting
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016 19
LIKAT Rostock
[Ir(ppy)2(bpy)]PF6 [Fe3(CO)12]
THF/H2O/TEA 6/2/4, 25 °C Xe lamp, 0.5 eq. P(Ph(CF3)2)3
or Au/TiO2, 25°C, MeOH/H2O 1:1, Hg lamp
„Proof of principle“
Demonstration model
(10/2014)
Upscaling
mesopor. C3N4 (CN-6)/ Pt/TEOA
H2 generation: 0.5 L h-1
1.22 m2
H2 generation for propeller 10 mW Pt-TiO2-
Cu(InGa)Se2- Mo/Pt
16 x 4 cm2
H2 generation: up to 0.2 L h-1
H2 and O2 storage in bags
Output: 5 Wel for 1 h
20
Highlights
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 21
Hydrogen Storage
Physical storage
Compressed H2
Liquid H2
Cryo-physisorption • zeolithe
• MOFs
• PIMs
• SWCNTs, MWNTs, GNFs
• aluminium cylinders 6.7 wt % (500
bar)
• steel cylinder 2.5 wt % (11.000 bar)
• composite materials 6.0 wt % (700
bar)
• <15% of energy for compression
• steel cylinder
• stored at 22.4 K
• boil off 0.4 % (50 m³ tank)
• 40 % of the energy for cooling
• cryo compressed (+25% capacity)
Chemical storage
Hydrides
Ammonia, Hydrazine,
Amino-, Ammoniaborane,
C-based H2 Carrier
• metal hydrides (MgH2,
NaBH4…)
• complex hydrides (NaAlH4,…)
• NH3, N2H4
• RNH2BH3, NH3BH3
• [Mg(NH3)6]Cl2
• MeOH, EtOH
• LOHC: Decaline, Methylcyclo-
hexane, Carbazole, Marlotherm
• formic acid
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
Energy Storage in Nature
Only visible light is used (400 – 700nm): 50% loss
Reflection, absorption and transmission by leaves: 20% loss
Limited light reaction efficiency (8-10 photos per CO2): 72-77% loss
Respiration required for translocation and biosynthesis: 40% loss
Total theoretical efficiency is not more than 5.5-6.6% (reality:
0.6%)
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016 22
LIKAT Rostock
liquid slightly toxic* 1.76 kWh/L 4.38 wt% H2
CO2 neutral ambient conditions no H2 to water
* LD50 (oral rat): 730 mg/kg (OECD guideline 401)
FA: Hydrogen Transfer Reagent & Energy Carrier
∆G°: -32.8 …+9.4 kJ mol-1
23
Pilot plant for CO2-based FA synthesis developed at BASF
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 24
H2-Storage ̶ a CO2-neutral cycle
B. Loges, A. Boddien, H. Junge, M. Beller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3962 („Hot paper“); A. Boddien, B. Loges, H. Junge, M. Beller, ChemSusChem 2008, 1, 751; A. Boddien, F. Gärtner, C. Federsel, P. Sponholz, D. Mellmann, R. Jackstell, H. Junge, M. Beller, Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 6535.
Dr. B. Loges
For a similar approach see the work of Gabor Laurenzcy et al. and Fukuzumi et al.
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 25
8 cycles with the same catalyst with only slight deactivation!
0
1000
2000
3000
Vg
as (
H2+
CO
2)
[mL
]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
cycle
CO2 hydrogenation (H2 recharge) - production of x HCO2H·y NEt3: 14.4 mmol NEt3, 10.4 µmol [RuH2(dppm)2], 20 mL DMF, 30 bar H2, 30 bar CO2, RT; Decomposition (H2 release): RT; Addition of 0.1 mL (0.73 mmol) NEt3 after each run.
Towards a Hydrogen Battery
Unprecedented formic acid to amine ratio of 2.69 (high energy content)
Fast H2 loading (even at RT) and unloading kinetics High productivity for H2 liberation of (TON: 800000)
A. Boddien, C. Federsel, P. Sponholz, D. Mellmann, R. Jackstell, H. Junge, G. Laurenczy, M. Beller, Energy & Environmental Science 2012, 5, 8907.
Dehydrogenation after „Loading“
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 26
Reaction conditions: left: 9.52 μmol [RuCl2(benzene)]2, 6eq. dppe, 20 mL N,N-dimethyloctylamine (DMOA), 25 °C, p=0 bar, 300 rpm, const. addition of HCO2H 13 µL/min; right: 50 μmol [RuCl2(benzene)]2, 600 µmol dppe, 40 mL N,N-dimethyloctylamine (DMOA), 60 °C, p=6.5 bar, 300 rpm, const. addition of HCO2H 60-1300 µL/min.
P. Sponholz, D. Mellmann, H. Junge, M. Beller ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 1172.
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45
time [days]
gas f
low
[m
l/m
in],
FA
flo
w [
μl/m
in]
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
H2 [%
]
gas flow [ml/min]
FA flow [μl/min]
H2 [%]
985 L gas from 841 mL FA
gas flow: 15.2 mL min-1
CO: < 2 ppm
TON: 1,058,546
Continuous hydrogen generation from FA
Dr. P. Sponholz
TOF up to 47,000 h-1
up to 47 L H2/h CO: < 2 ppm Energy up to 128 Wh
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 27
Advantages of Combination:
Hydrogen generation on demand via low
temperature H2 reforming
FC waste heat for FA reactor
Low CO content (< 10 ppm) HCOOH
Vorlage
Heizung
+ -
Brennstoffzelle
%
H2 50%,
CO2 50%
Luft
FM1
PI01
TI04
FM2PI02
TI02
rH01
TI01
Kondensat
TI9
MFC
Column
(Carbotex)
Massen-
flussmessung
Pumpe1
Pumpe 2
MFC
Sicherheitventil
TI05
TI08 TI10
TI07
TI06
Handventil
TI03
Gas-/Gas-
Befeuchter
Kühlung
AmeisensäurereaktorBrennstoffzellenstack
Temperierkreislauf
%
rH02
FM3
Filter
Flüssig-/Gas-
Befeuchter
Gasanalyse
Reactor
Temp. cycle
Fuel Cell Stack
(Thermal) coupling with a LT-PEMFC
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 20 40 60
Cu
rre
nt
[A];
Vo
lta
ge
[V
]; P
el [W
]
Ga
s f
low
[m
L/m
in]
Time [h]
Gas flow [mL/min]
Power [W]
Current [A]
Voltage [V]
Source: C. Heßke, „Die Nutzung des Energiespeichermediums Ameisensäure für den kontinuierlichen Brennstoffzellenbetrieb“ presented at the 6th Workshop AiF – Brennstoffzellenallianz, 23. + 24. April 2013 in Duisburg
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 28
State-of-the-Art-Fe-Catalysts
TON: > 90,000
TOF: > 5,000 h-1
364.8 ml formic acid generate
>470 L hydrogen, CO: <10 ppm
C. Federsel, A. Boddien, R. Jackstell, P. J. Dyson, R. Scopelliti, G. Laurenczy, M. Beller,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9777.
A. Boddien, D. Mellmann, F. Gärtner, R. Jackstell, H. Junge, P. J. Dyson, G. Laurenczy, R. Ludwig, M. Beller, Science 2011, 333,
1733; D. Mellmann, E. Barsch, M. Bauer, K. Grabow, A. Boddien, A.
Kammer, P. Sponholz, U. Bentrup, R. Jackstell, H. Junge, G. Laurenczy, R. Ludwig, M. Beller, Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 13589.
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 29
Direct catalytic Reduction of CO2
See e.g. E. Fujita Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 185–186, 373; G. Centi et al, Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 1711; Y. Izumi, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 171; Y. Amao, ChemChatChem 2011, 3, 458; C. Wang et. al J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 48.
.
Different products for CO2 reduction possible – proton coupled more electron processes are favoured (vs NHE at pH 7)
Kin
eti
c
Th
erm
od
yn
am
ic
photo-catalytic
electro-catalytic (Co-electrolysis)
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 30
Photochemical Reduction of CO2 to Formate
TON: 67 40 419 S: 526
Selectivity: 1.7 : 1 : 11 (80%)
TON: - 6 34 S: 40
Selectivity: 0 : 1 : 6 (85%)
MSc A. Rosas
L = CO, HCOO-, Cl, H2O, HCO3
2-
Isotope-labelling exp. H13COO
-
13CO
H13COO-
NMP
or
mesopor. C3N4 (CN-6)
Irradiation time / h
Pro
duct
s /
TO
N
HCOO-
CO
H2
A. Rosas, H. Junge, M. Beller, ChemCatChem, 2015, 7, 3316
For a previous example of Ru-based CO2 reduction catalysts see also Lehn et al. J. Organomet Chem. 1990, 382, 157.
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 31
Selective Photocatalytic CO2 reduction to CO
Catalyst Photosensitizer CO
(TON) H2
(TON) Selec. (CO)
1 [Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)]+ 421 28 94%
2 [Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)]+ 429 0 100%
[Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)]+
7.5 mL CO2-saturated solution of NMP/TEOA (5:1, v/v), 1.0 µmol catalyst, 12.5 µmol PS.
Increased CO selectivity and activity by Knölker iron complexes with q.y. up to 68%
MSc A. Rosas Dr. P. Alsabeh
A. Rosas-Hernández, P. G. Alsabeh, E. Barsch, H. Junge, R. Ludwig, M. Beller, Chem. Comm. 2016, DOI: 10.1039/C6CC01671E
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
Only a question of energy densities?
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5
Gravimetric energy density / [kWh/kg]
Volu
metr
ic e
nerg
y d
ensity / [k
Wh/l]
CH2, 350 bar
CH2, 700 bar
LH2
Metal Hydrides
Li-Ion Battery
DOE 2015
DOE 2010
CNG
Gasoline: 12 kWh/kg; 8.8 kWh/l
Formic Acid
Carbazol
Methanol/ Ethanol (reforming)
Source: C. Heßke, „Die Nutzung des Energiespeichermediums Ameisensäure für den kontinuierlichen Brennstoffzellenbetrieb“ presented at the 6th Workshop AiF – Brennstoffzellenallianz, 23rd - 24th April 2013 in Duisburg/Germany
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016 32
LIKAT Rostock
Applications
base material for the chemical industry (formaldehyde,
ethylene, propylene); 60 mill. tons p.a. (2012)
fuel additive (MTBE)
fuel for internal combustion engines M5 to M100 (ON > 100)
clean marine fuel
Methanol – a common resource
33 Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
CO2-based methanol synthesis
First examples published in lab scale with homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts e.g. Leitner et. al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7499 ([(Triphos)Ru(TMM)]; TON 221); e.g. Tsang et. al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5832 (CuZnO catalysts); Three plants based on CO2 + 3 H2 = CH3OH + H2O; "George Olah CO2 to Renewable Methanol
Plant” in Iceland (4 Mill. L p. a.; ca. 3.500 t); Silicon Fire AG (50 L p. d.) and Mitsui Chemicals Japan (Pilot Plant - 100 t p. a.) (G. Olah, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 104)
„green energy“
water
methanol H2O 3 H2
CO2
liquid 4.44 kWh/L 12.6 wt% H2
CO2 neutral ambient conditions toxic
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016 34
LIKAT Rostock
MeOH Reforming by Homogeneous Catalysts
M. Nielsen, E. Alberico, W. Baumann, H.-J. Drexler, H. Junge, S. Gladiali, M. Beller Nature 2013, 495, 85, see also: R. E. Rodríguez-Lugo, M. Trincado, M. Vogt, F. Tewes, G. Santiso-Quinones, H. Grützmacher, Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 342; recently further examples have been reported by Milstein,Yamaguchi, Crabtree,…
Thermodynamics: ΔH298K = + 49.4 kJ mol-1
State-of-the-art:
Dumesic and co-workers, Nature 2002.
Pt or Sn/Ni, 200-225 °C, 25-50 bars of pressure, <300 ppm of CO contamination
Our recent system:
Full MeOH reforming to 3H2 + CO2 achieved, performs <100 °C,
TOF(max) ~5000 h-1 (counted per H2 molecule evolved), TON >350000, catalytic system active for weeks, <1 ppm levels of CO.
35 Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
TON (Ru) = 350000
Dr. M. Nielsen
MeOH Reforming@70-90°C
36
27% yield
59% yield in 24h with 150 ppm cat.
CO < 10 ppm
M. Nielsen, E. Alberico, W. Baumann, H.-J. Drexler, H. Junge, S. Gladiali, M. Beller Nature 2013, 495, 85.
MeOH/H2O (9:1, 40 mL)
KOH (8.0 M)
Tset = 94 °C
Henrik Junge / 21st WHEC Zaragoza 2016 2016-06-13
Dr. E. Alberico
TOF (Fe)
up to 777 h-1
TON (Fe)
up to 10,000
Stabilization
by addition of
further ligand
E. Alberico, P. Sponholz, C. Cordes, M. Nielsen, H.-J. Drexler, W. Baumann, H. Junge, M. Beller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 14162.
LIKAT Rostock
CH3OH
CO2
H2
H2O
½ O2
H2
CO2 containing gas (>98%) CO2 sources
coupling with PEM FC
mini plant
coordinator catalyst development
electrolysis
MeOH production by silicon fire process
Funding:
Realization of the „Metha-Cycle“
37 Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock
Upscale experiment for fuel cell application
38
Conditions
propeller with ~10 mW (video: NDR Nordmagazin 2013)
40 mL MeOH/H2O 9:1 (v:v)
8 M KOH, 91°C
17 µmol catalyst (8 mg)
H2 per hour: ca. 0.1 L
CO content: < 10 ppm
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
LIKAT Rostock 39
Conclusion
M. Aresta et al. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1709.
Social Effects:
merging of chemical and energetic industries
potential to (partly) decentralize energy and chemicals generation
big scale centralised solutions clothed to power plants, cement works and steel mills
value adding in less developed regions (technologies for CO2 usage from air required))
Power to X – State of the Art:
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016
methods for CO2 reduction available or
already applied with high selectivity in
methanol/CH4/HCOOH/CO …….
need to collect, store and pressurize
hydrogen renewable hydrogen has to be
available at low price level (e.g. ≤ 4 €/kg)
application of direct photocatalytic hydrogen
generation is pending
direct photo-reduction of CO2 in water may
become an important option in the near
future
LIKAT Rostock 40
Acknowledgements
Prof. Matthias Beller
Funding
Dr. Associate Prof. Shu-Ping Luo (ZJUT Hangzhou)
Dr. Haijun Jiao (LIKAT; DFT)
Dr. V. Brüser (INP Greifswald, Plasmatechn.)
Dr. E. Alberico (CNR Sassari)
Prof. M. Bauer (Univ. Paderborn, XAS)
Prof. A. Brückner (LIKAT, EPR)
Prof. R. Ludwig, (Univ. Rostock, IR, DFT)
Prof. S. Lochbrunner (Univ. Rostock, UV, time resolved photoluminescence)
Cooperation
Henrik Junge / Konferenz des LVE - Berlin, 30. Juni 2016