Welche Targets, welche Substanzen bleiben nach · PDF fileWelche Targets, welche Substanzen...
date post
08-Aug-2018Category
Documents
view
213download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Welche Targets, welche Substanzen bleiben nach · PDF fileWelche Targets, welche Substanzen...
Welche Targets, welche Substanzen bleiben nach
GATSBY, RAINFALL & Co. fr die Therapie
fortgeschrittener, gastrosophagealer Tumoren?
Prof. Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Krankenhaus Nordwest
UCT- University Cancer Center Frankfurt
1. Murad, et al. Cancer 1993; 2. Vanhoefer, et al. J Clin Oncol 20003. Al-Batran, et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 4. Cunningham, et al. N Engl J Med 2008
5. Van Cutsem, et al. J Clin Oncol 2006; 6. Kang, et al. Ann Oncol 2009
Magenkarzinom: berleben nach Erstlinientherapie
BSC1
FAMTX2
PLF3
FLO3
ECF4
EOF4
DCF5
XP6
ECX4
EOX4
Median OS (months)
Lordick, Lorenzen et al Gastric Cancer 2014; 17(2):213-25
HER2: pos. bei jedem 5.-6. Patienten
Trastuzumab wirksam
Lapatinib nicht ausreichend effektiv
TDM1 nicht ausreichend effektiv
Pertuzumab Prfung (Jakob Studie)
Anti VEGF (anti-angiogen)
Bevacizumab-Studie (AVAGAST) negativ
Ramucirumab: wirksam in 2nd-Line
Bang et al. Lancet 2010; 376: 687-697Satoh et al. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32(19):2039-49
Ohtsu et al. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 3968-76
Magenkarzinom Zielgerichtete Therapie
Kang YK et al. ASCO GI 2016;
Wilke et al. Lancet Oncol 2014Fuchs et al. Lancet 2014
HER2
1520% of gastroesophageal cancers are HER2 positive
Median survival for HER2 IHC 3+ patients 18 months!
1. Bang, et al. Lancet 2010
Trastuzumab improved outcomes in patients with HER2-positive tumours
ToGA1
(n=584)
Al-Batran. Data on file0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Su
rviv
al p
rob
abili
ty
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36
11.8 16.0
Time (months)
HR=0.65(95% CI: 0.510.83)
Events
Trastuzumab + XC/FC 120
XC/FC 136
HER2 IHC
HER2 SISH
Pertuzumab: HER-2 Dimerisierungsinhibitor
HER2
HER1, 3, 4
Pertuzumab
Pertuzumab blockiert die HER2 Dimerisierung und verhindert die ber den HER Signalweg vermittelte Tumorzellproliferation und berleben16
Pertuzumab fhrt zu ADCC 7
1. Agus DB, et al. Cancer Cell 2002; 2:127137; 2. Hughes JB, et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2009; 8:18851892; 3. Herbst RS, et al. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13:61756181;4. Baselga J. Cancer Cell 2002; 2:9395; 5. Citri A, et al. Exp Cell Res 2003; 284:5465; 6. Franklin MC, et al. Cancer Cell 2004; 5:317328; 7. Scheuer W, et al. Cancer Res 2009; 69:93309336.
Jakob-Phase III Studie : Pertuzumab plus Trastuzumab
plus Chemotherapie in der Erstlinientherapie
Ergebnisse werden 2017 erwartet
VEGF/VEGFR
Anti VEGFR Antikrper Ramucirumab
Ramucirumab versus BSC Paclitaxel + /- Ramucirumab
REGARD RAINBOW
Fuchs et al. Lancet 2013
Wilke et al. Lancet Oncology 2014
FOLFIRI + Ramucirumab
Paclitaxel + Ramucirumab
R
2
1n=101
Primrer Endpunkt: OS Rate nach 6 Monaten, Statistik ausgelegt auf experimentellen Arm. Kein statistischer Vergleich
Progression nach 1st-line Platin + Fluoropyrimidin (+/-Epirubicin; +/-Docetaxel;+/-Trastuzumab)
RAMIRIS: 2nd-line, randomisierte
Phase II, Ram-Folfiri (AIO Studie)
Metastatic Gastric Cancer
HER2 positive disease HER2 negative disease
1L
Doublet + trastuzumab
Platinum/FP/trastuzumab
(XP/trastuzumab)
1L*
Triplet
Platinum/FP/docetaxel
(FLOT)
1L
Doublet
Platinum/FP (FOLFOX)
Irinotecan/FP (FOLFIRI)
**Patients refusing chemotherapy
Unfit for paclitaxel
(Indolent disease)
2L
Ramucirumab/paclitaxel
3L
Irinotecan/FOLFIRI or
taxanes
*Young patient
Good ECOG PS
High remission pressure
High motivation
2L
Irinotecan/FOLFIRI or
taxanes
2L
Ramucirumab monotherapy**
Adapted from:
http://www.nccn.org/professionals/
physician_gls/PDF/gastric.pdf
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FP, fluorouracil, cisplatin; FLOT, fluorouracil,
leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel; FOLFIRI, leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan; FOLFOX,
leucovorin, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin; PS, performance status; XP, capecitabine, cisplatin.
TCGA: Molekulare Klassifikation
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Nature 2014
9%
22%20%
50%
Mutations
Mutations
Mutations
RTKIs(Immun-therapie) PIK3CA
PTENImmuntherapie
ImmuntherapieRTKIs
Neu Anstze!Stammzellen etc.
Immuntherapie
PD-L1 in gastric cancer
Expression rate about 40%1
More pronounced in intestinal type1
Associated
with better outcome in operable disease1
Worse outcome in metastatic disease
PD-1/PD-L1 pathway
PD-1 is a negative co-stimulatory receptor expressed primarily on activated T cells. Binding of its ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2) inhibits effector T-cell function2
1. Kim, et al. Gastric Cancer 20142. Keir, et al. Annu Rev Immunol 2008
KEYNOTE-012- Pembrolizumab
Monotherapie
Metastasierte, PD-L1 + sophagus-Ca und AEG (n=23)
Metastasierte, PD-L1 + Magenkarzinome (n=36)
Bang, et al. ASCO 2015Doi et al, ASCO GI 2016
KEYNOTE-012- Pembrolizumab
Monotherapie (Magenkarzinom)T
umorverkleinerung
Bang, et al. ASCO 2015
Fazit: PD-L1 Inhibition aktiv beim MagenkarzinomOptimale Patientenselektion: unklar!
Trial Design
JAVELIN Gastric 100,
Merck KGaA
1th line
Maintenance with Avelumab versus Continuation of First-line
FOLFOX or XELOX
1th Line
N=666, 2018
PE: OS
JAVELIN Gastric 300
Merck KGaA
3d line
Avelumab vs. Irinotecan or Paclitaxel
PE: OS
N=330, 2017
MK-3475-062/KEYNOTE-
062), MSD
1th line
Pembrolizumab vs. Pembrolizumab + Cisplatin/FP vs. Cisplatin/FP
PD-L1+ patients, N=750, 2019
PE: PFS and OS
MK-3475-061/KEYNOTE-
061, MSD
2nd line
Pembrolizumab vs. Paclitaxel after platinum/FP
N=720, December 2017
PE: PFS and OS in PD-L1+ patients
CheckMate 577
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Adjuvant
Nivolumab vs. Placebo for resected esophageal or GEJ after
neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and resection (Stage II/III)
N=760, 2020
PE: DFS and OS
Phase III immunotherapy trials
Immuntherapiekonzepte
Tumour
Lymph node
Blood vessel
Chen & Mellman. Immunity 2013
Release of cancer cell antigensChemotherapy
Radiation therapyTargeted therapy
1
Cancer antigen presentationVaccines
IFN-GM-CSF
Anti-CD40 (agonist)TLR agonist
2
Priming and activationAnti-PD1
Anti-PDL1Anti-CTLA-4
Anti-CD137 (agonist)Anti-OX40 (agonist)Anti-CD27 (agonist)
IL-2IL-12
3
Infiltration of T cells into tumours
Anti-VEGF
5
Recognition of cancercells by T cells
CARs
6
Killing of cancer cellsAnti-PDL1Anti-PD1
IDO inhibitors
7
Trafficking of T cellsto tumours
4
+ EOX Chemotherapy *
(immunogenic cell death)
T Cell Infiltration
Induction of Adaptive T cell immunity***
IMAB362-coated Tumour Cell Debris
Pro-Inflammatory, Chemoattractant Environment
Cross-presentation by APCs**
*Kroemer et al, 2013; **Rogers, Veeramani and Weiner, 2014; ***Biachini and Gianni, 2014EOX: Epirubicine, Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine
Chimeric IgG1 backbone antibody Highly specific for CLDN18.2 CLDN18.2: Component of tight junction
protein
Modes of action: Antibody-dependent cellular
cytotoxicity (ADCC)
Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC)
In Combination with chemotherapy: enhances T-cell infiltration induces pro-inflammatory
cytokines
Al-Batran et al. ASCO 2016; #LBA4001
FAST Studie IMAB362 Antikrper
Centers in GER (10), CZE (2), LAT (3), RUS (18), UKR (12),
pts Randomized: N = 252
Arm 1EOX
N = 84
Arm 2EOX/IMAB362 800/600 mg/m
N = 77
Arm 3EOX/IMAB362 1000 mg/m
N = 85
Excluded (n = 478) 44 pts w/o tumor tissue sample 352 pts CLDN18.2 neg/low expressors 82 pts eligibility criteria not fulfilled (19
WoC, 63 others)
Not treated (n = 6) 1 pt in Arm 1 (Anemia G2) 2 pts in Arm 2 (SAE/Anemia G3, WoC) 3 pts in Arm 3 (AE/incr. liver enzymes,
SAE/deep vein thrombosis, WoC)
Safety Set = Full Analysis Set (Pts with 1 treatment of any study drug)
CLDN18.2 assessable: N = 686
pts Treated: N = 246
Consented for CLDN18.2 screen: N = 730
Al-Batran et al. ASCO 2016; #LBA4001
FAST Studie Patient Distribution
mPFS 5.6 vs. 7.2 moHR 0.36p=
Zusammenfassung
Her2+ Magenkarzinom: Pertuzumab/Trastuzumab/Cx vs. Trastuzumab/Cx Her2-Blockade + Immuntherapie (phase1/2)
Immuntherapie PD-1/PD-L1 AK in Phase III, 1.-3. Linie + adjuvant
Wirksam? Mit oder ohne Cx? Kombinationen: CTLA-4 AK + PD1/PD-L1 AK (ohne Cx) und
VEGF/VEGR AK + PD1/PD-L1 AK
Neue Anstze Z.B. IMAB362 (Phase 2)
Sonstiges Weiterentwicklung Ramucirumab, MMP-9, Multitarget
TKIs, STAT Inhibitor