Schaffung eines harmonisierten Regelwerkes Entwickelt in ... · PDF fileEN elevated...

download Schaffung eines harmonisierten Regelwerkes Entwickelt in ... · PDF fileEN elevated temperature properties 20MnMoNi4-5 1.6311 QT 0 250 3.1 10028-2 ... Inclusion of High Strength Steel

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of Schaffung eines harmonisierten Regelwerkes Entwickelt in ... · PDF fileEN elevated...

  • 1

    Entwicklungen und Ergebnisse der ersten Revision des Teils 2 Werkstoffe der DIN EN 13445

    Dr. Peter LangenbergIngenieurbro fr Werkstofftechnik, IWT7. Europische Druckgertetage 2007, Mnchen

    Entwicklung: Europisches Regelwerk EN13445

    Schaffung eines harmonisierten Regelwerkes: Entwickelt in den 90er Jahren durch CEN-Mitglieder im CENTC54

    PED 97/23/EC: europische Richtlinie zur Harmonisierung der Mrkte, 1997

    EN13445, Teile 1 bis 6 : Erste Verffentlichung (August 2002)

  • 2

    Entwicklung: Wie reagiert Europa?

    Die meisten Lnder halten an nationalen Normen fest und passen diese an PED an (z.B. AD2000, CODAP, PD5500).

    Ausnahme: Finnland versucht als einziges Land konsequente Umsetzung.

    Konsequenz: zgerliche Weiterentwicklung der EN13445 obwohlviel Kritik gebt wird

    Wie ist der aktuelle Stand?

    Fakten 2007

    1. alle WGs im CENTC54 arbeiten an erster Revision. Ziel: Marktreife fr weltweiten Markt.

    2. WG-Sekretariate fr Teil 2 Werkstoffe und Teil 4 Fertigung in Deutschland (DIN).

    3. CENTC 54: JWG B Materials und SG Low Temperaturesseit 2003 Erarbeitung von 3 Amendments

    4. Erste Revision geplant fr 2008 (Diskussionsstand: 6/2007)

  • 3

    Was machte die JWG B seit 2002?

    pr A3: Revision of Table A2-1 in Annex A

    pr A4: Revision of clause B4.3, working plate

    pr A5: Revision of Method 1 and 2 in Annex B: Material selection for avoidance of brittlefractureprA4 and A5 prepared by Subgroup Low Temperature:A. Kittel , H. Krebs, F. HanusR. Sandstrm, J. Hietalahti, I. Partridge

    Amendment prA3, Table A.2-1D.2 European standardised steels grouped according to product forms

    The references in this table do not include the date of the standard, but they are dated references as given in clause Bibliography.Table D.2-1 European standardised steels grouped according to product forms

    3.11000NT1.636815NiCuMoNb5-6-4elevated temperature propertiesEN 10028-2

    plate and strip

    9

    3.12500QT1.631120MnMoNi4-5elevated temperature propertiesEN 10028-2

    plate and strip

    8

    1.2250150QT1.541418MnMo4-5elevated temperature propertiesEN 10028-2

    plate and strip

    7

    1.21500NT1.541418MnMo4-5elevated temperature propertiesEN 10028-2

    plate and strip

    6

    e1.22500N, NT1.541516Mo3elevated temperature propertiesEN 10028-2

    plate and strip

    5

    1.22500N1.0473P355GHelevated temperature propertiesEN 10028-2

    plate and strip

    4

    1.22500N1.0481P295GHelevated temperature propertiesEN 10028-2

    plate and strip

    3

    1.12500N1.0425P265GHelevated temperature propertiesEN 10028-2

    plate and strip

    2

    1.12500N1.0345P235GHelevated temperature propertiesEN 10028-2

    plate and strip

    1

    max.min.Notes

    Material

    groupto

    CR ISO15608

    ThicknessmmHeat

    treatment g

    MaterialnumberGradeMaterial description

    European

    Standard

    Product formNo

    10987654321

    Table D.2-1informativ

    max. Thickness accordingto EN Material Standard

  • 4

    Amendment pr A4

    The weld production test plate shall be performed in accordance with EN 13445-4:2002-05, clause 8.

    The following requirements are additional to the requirements in EN 13445-4:2002-05, clause 8. In addition to this a weld production test plate is required according to welding procedurespecifications for TKV equal to or above 30 C, if the material thickness is greater than 12 mm.

    For TKV below 30 C a weld production test plate 3) is required if the material thickness is greater than 6 mm.

    The impact energy requirements of method 1 or 2 shall be met.

    B4.3 Production test plates

    Finnish in

    itiative

    Amendment prA5

    1. Change in philosophy as concerns steels for warm and cold going vessels (GERMAN experience)

    2. Inclusion of High Strength Steel with Yield Strength up to 690 MPa and Duplex Stainless Steels (ECOPRESS)

    3. New method 2 (ECOPRESS)

    4. New method 1 (ECOPRESS)

    5. New chapter on bolts and nuts

  • 5

    1. Divide after warm and cold going vessels

    Actual situation:

    Operation temperature: e.g. 500 CLowest temperature during start up or shut down: -10C

    Consequence: Charpy requirements after Method 1 or 2 @ -10

    New proposal :

    For vessels with operation temperature higher 50C new chapterB.5 applies:

    1. TD,min = -10C, for charpy requirement @ Room temperature2. Pressure shall not exceed 50 % of Design pressure if T 20 C

    2. Revision of Nomograms in Method 2

    Aus

    legu

    ngst

    empe

    ratu

    r, T R

    Prftemperatur TKV

    KV:27 J for Rp 310 MPaand40 J for Rp 460 MPa

    AW limited to 35 mmPWHT limited to 110 mmStrength limited to 460 MPA

    Figure B2-1, PWHT

  • 6

    Reason for new method 2 : include HSS up to 690 MPa Comparison of Design Stress between DBF and DBA

    3,4

    11,4

    28,0

    28,0

    28,0

    15,0

    0,0 5,0 10,0 15,0 20,0 25,0 30,0

    P265 N

    P355 N

    P420 Q

    P500 Q

    P690 Q

    DUPLEX 2205st

    eel g

    rade

    s

    relative stress advantage of DBA in %

    relative stress advantage in %

    Toughness, T27J transition temperatureP690, 50 mm

    -127

    -151

    -101

    0

    -159

    -27

    -180 -160 -140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0

    BM

    HAZ (FL+1)

    WM

    Temperature , C

    PWHT, 3h, 580CAW

    2nd reason: Modernise Brittle Fracture Concept

    1. Endkraterriss2. Querriss im SG3. Querriss in WEZ4. Lngsriss im SG5. Kaltriss in WEZ6. Bindefehler7. Wurzelriss8. Kantenriss

  • 7

    NEW Fracture Mechanics Model: Failure assumption

    Beispiel: Wide Plate Test

    P460, T27J = -50C,TPrf = -110 C

    Modellfehler:

    ad2cd

    ad = ta/c = 0,33

    NEW Fracture Mechanics Calculation Model

    CEGB R6 Option 2KR=

    KIKmat

    LR=BruttoFlie

    Kmat= KRKI

    LIMIT STATEnot safe

    safe

    MASTER CURVE[MPa m]

    CORRELATION

    Einwirkung

    Widerstand

    Grenzzustand

  • 8

    Verification with Wide Plate tests (ECOPRESS)

    HAZ

    HAZ

    Steels P500 P690t , mm 30 50 80 30 50 80BM no 3 3 no 3 3AW 3 5 no 3 5 noPWHT no 6 no no 6 no

    Verification of Calculation Model

    -180-160-140-120-100

    -80-60-40-20

    020

    -180 -160 -140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20Td [C]

    T exp

    [C

    ]

    1:1lineP500_AW_50P500_AW_30P500_PWHT_50P690_AW_50P690_AW_30P690_PWHT_50+25K-25K

    unsafe

    safe

    28 tests

  • 9

    Transfer to EN13445-2, Annex B : New

    Methode 1, Code of practice, Tabellen in Anlehnung an EN Werkstoffnormen und berechnet nach neuer Methode 2

    Methode 2, bruchmechanische Basis in Anlehnung an ECOPRESS, jetzt bis P500, bis 110 mm und DUPLEX bis 50 mm.

    Methode 3, Bruchmechanische Sicherheits-analyse, wie bisher

    PED: Essential Safety Requirements

    3. min. ZhigkeitT27J

    T27Jmin

    T27JGem.

    2. min. Festigkeit1.Fehlerfreiheit

    4. PED; Annex 1, Clause 7: TR = T27J, A5 14 %

  • 10

    New Method 1: Code of Practice

    Plates and Strips Max. reference

    thickness eB

    No. as per Table D.2-1

    European Standard

    EN

    Grade Material No.

    AW PWHT

    Design reference

    temperature TR (C)

    Material group to CR ISO

    15608:2000

    Remarks

    1 P235GH 1.0345 35 90 Rounded 2 P265GH 1.0425 35 75

    1.1

    3 P295GH 1.0481 35 65 4

    10028-2:2003

    P355GH 1.0473 35 55

    20 1.2

    29 P275NH 1.0487 35 75 20 30 P275NL1 1.0488 35 75 40 31 P275NL2 1.1104 35 90 50

    1.1

    32 P355N 1.0562 35 55 20 33 P355NH 1.0565 35 55 20 34 P355NL1 1.0566 35 55 40 35 P355NL2 1.1106 35 55 50

    1.2

    36 37 38

    10028-3:2003

    Extract of new Table B.2-2

    Max. limit thickness calculated on Basis (PED) TR = T27J

    NEW Method 2

    -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20

    -120

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    500 MPa, 40 J, PWHT

    8080

    54

    60

    40

    40

    20

    30

    7

    20

    -8

    10

    -21

    eBMETHOD 2

    1. For Ferritic with Ni 1,5 % , new Nomograms up to 500 MPa including.

    2. For DUPLEX up to 550 MPa Yield strength newnomograms and t max = 50 mm.

  • 11

    New Method 2: Exemption for consideration of experience

    -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20

    -120

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    265 M Pa, 27 J, PW HT

    110110

    40

    90

    30

    70

    15

    50

    -5

    40

    -20

    30

    -41

    20

    -66

    10

    -96

    eBMETHOD 2

    T R,

    C

    TKV, C

    The dashed line:

    1. Charpy requirment= 40 J @ TKV

    2. For Steels with 265 MPa yield for t from 75 to 110 mm

    3. For Steels with 355 MPa yield for t from 65 to 110 mm

    -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20

    -120

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    355 M P a, 27 J, PW HT

    110110

    57

    90

    48

    70

    35

    50

    17

    40

    4

    30

    -12

    20

    -30

    10

    -48

    e BMET HO D 2

    T R,

    C

    T C

    265 MPa

    355 MPa

    Method 3: Structural Integrity Analysis

    model fine mesh 3D-Shell model coarse mesh

    Stress Concentration Area

    dary conditions-acements calculated the shell model

    1. Bruchmechanisches Modell2. Werkstoffzhigkeit3. Risstreibende Kraft (FEM oder FAD)4. Grenzzustand K J Werktoff = K J Bauteil5. Kritischer Fehler; Spannung, Zhigkeit

    CEGB R6 Option 2KR=