An#hormonelle Therapie 2017 - verständlich erläutert · BRCA Testung anbieten (falls klinische...

41
M.Thill PD Dr. M. Thill Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Zertifiziertes Brustzentrum (DKG/DGS) Zertifiziertes Gynäkologisches Krebszentrum (DKG) Zertifiziertes Endometriosezentrum AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus Frankfurt am Main „Gemeinsam verstehen“ Pa0en0nnentag des interdisziplinären Brust und Genitalkrebszentrum am AGAPLESION Markus-Krankenhaus, 10.09.2017 An#hormonelle Therapie 2017 - verständlich erläutert -

Transcript of An#hormonelle Therapie 2017 - verständlich erläutert · BRCA Testung anbieten (falls klinische...

M.Thill

PD Dr. M. Thill Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Zertifiziertes Brustzentrum (DKG/DGS)

Zertifiziertes Gynäkologisches Krebszentrum (DKG) Zertifiziertes Endometriosezentrum AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus

Frankfurt am Main

„Gemeinsamverstehen“Pa0en0nnentagdesinterdisziplinärenBrustundGenitalkrebszentrumamAGAPLESIONMarkus-Krankenhaus,10.09.2017

An#hormonelleTherapie2017-verständlicherläutert-

M.Thill

CHEMOTHERAPIE-  ReduziertdieTumorgröße-  VerhindertLokalrezidiv

undFernmetastasierung

ADJUVANTETHERAPIE–unterstütztdieopera0veTherapieinderVerbesserungdesOutcomes

DIAGNOSE

STAGING

NEO-ADJUVANTETHERAPIE

OPERATIO

N

RADIOTHERAPIE–verhindertdasLokalrezidiv

An0hormonelleTherapie,fallsHR+für5-10Jahre–verhindertLokalrezidivundFernmetastasierung

An0-HER2fallsHER2+-zusätzlichzurChemotherapiefür1Jahr;dakardiotoxischbeiAnthrazyklinensequen0elleGabeMul0genassay

beiHR+

Neoadjuvante/adjuvanteTherapie

M.Thill

AdjuvanteBehandlungsstrategien

HER2posi#v

Chemotherapie+Trastuzumab(+Pertuzumab)*

±endokrineTherapie**

AnthrazyklineundTaxan-hal#geChemotherapie

(ggf.+Pla0n)

Triplenega#ve(ERundPRundHER2nega#v)

LuminalAoderlowrisk

(nurbeipN0-1)

LuminalBoderhighrisk

(immerbeipN2-3)

Lymphknotenbefallaxillär,Grading,Ki-67Mul0gensignaturoderuPA/PAI-1Test

endokrineTherapie**

Chemotherapie→endokrineTherapie**

Luminal-like(ERund/oderPRposi#v)(HER2

nega#v)

Indika0onzurChemotherapie≥pT1bvorzugsweiseneoadjuvant

BRCATestunganbieten(fallsklinischeKonsequenzen)

*ZulassungnurfürneoadjuvanteTherapievorliegend **nurbeihormonrezeptor(ERund/oderPgR)-posi0vemTumor

Modn.N.Harbeck

M.Thill

An#hormonelleTherapie

•  Bes0mmteBruslumorzellenbenö0genzumWachsenweiblicheHormone,dieüberspezielle„Andockstellen“(sog.Rezeptoren)wirken.

•  BlockiertmandieseRezeptorenoderdieHormonproduk0on,könnendieKrebszellennichtmehrwachsen.

•  WelcheMedikamenteeingesetztwerden,hängtdavonab,obsichdiePa0en0nvorodernachdenWechseljahrenbefindet.

•  Diean0hormonelleTherapiewirdsowohlimfrühenalsauchimfortgeschrilenenStadiumeingesetzt,entwederalssogenannteMonotherapieoderinKombina0onmitanderenTherapien(wiez.B.mitderChemotherapieoderderAn0körpertherapie)

M.Thill

Zielederan#hormonellenTherapie

M.Thill

An#hormonelleTherapie=endokrineTherapie

Befund

Mein Befund:

Hormonrezeptorstatus (ER/PR)

Hormonrezeptorpositiver Brustkrebs?

Ja

Nein

Hormonrezeptorstatus (ER/PR)

Zellen stehen in ständigem Austausch mit ihrer Um-

gebung, denn sie sind Teil eines großen Ganzen,

eines Organismus. Wie in einer Gesellschaft z. B.

einzelnen Menschen unterschiedliche Aufgaben zu-

kommen, übernehmen in einem Organismus einzel-

nen Zelltypen ebenfalls unterschiedliche Aufgaben.

Damit Zellen mit anderen Zellen in Kontakt stehen

können, tragen sie Rezeptoren (Eiweißmoleküle),

an die z. B. Hormone oder Wachstumsfaktoren

„andocken” können.

Der Östrogenrezeptor (ER) oder der Progesteron-

rezeptor (PR) sind solche Eiweiße, an die diese

beiden weiblichen Geschlechtshormone (Östrogen

und Progesteron) binden können.

Brustzellen besitzen diese Rezeptoren, denn der

Brust kommen im Lebenszyklus einer Frau unter-

schiedliche Aufgaben zu, die durch diese beiden

Hormone gesteuert werden.

hormonrezeptornegativen Brustkrebs erkrankt sind,

SUR¿WLHUHQ�6LH�QLFKW�YRQ�HLQHU�VROFKHQ�7KHUDSLH�

Kreuzen Sie hier an, ob Sie an einem hormon-

rezeptorpositiven Brustkrebs erkrankt sind und

wenn ja, tragen Sie ein, an welchem.

Erkrankt eine Frau an Brustkrebs, kann es sein,

dass diese Rezeptoren auf den Brustkrebszellen

entweder im Übermaß oder aber überhaupt nicht

mehr vorhanden sind. Man spricht von hormon-

rezeptorpositivem oder hormonrezeptornegativem

Brustkrebs. Die Bestimmung des Hormonrezeptor-

status kann auf zwei unterschiedliche Weisen

erfolgen. In einem Fall wird er in Prozenten, im

anderen Fall mit Zahlen von 1-12 ausgedrückt.

Halten Sie hierzu Rücksprache mit Ihrem Arzt, um

seine Einschätzung zu Ihrem persönlichen Rezep-

torstatus zu erhalten

Wenn Sie an einem hormonrezeptorpositiven

Brustkrebs erkrankt sind, können Sie von einer Anti-

+RUPRQWKHUDSLH�SUR¿WLHUHQ��:HQQ�6LH�DQ�HLQHP�

20 21

M.Thill

CrossTalk–wennsichdieSignalwegeunterhalten

mTOR

Akt

PI3K

Wachstumsfaktoren:IGF-1R,VEGFR,ÊGFR,HER-2

ER

ER

ER

Östrogen

P

P

P

Zellprolifera#on

AI

Everolimus

M.Thill Yamamoto-IbusukiMetal.,BMCMedicine2015

EndokrineKombipartner

M.Thill

Prämenopausal•  Tamoxifen5-10Jahre(EBCTCG,ATLAS)•  GnRHMonobeiTam-Kontraindika0on(ZIPP)•  Tamoxifen5Jahre+GnRH5Jahre(Metaanalyse)•  Tam.+GnRH=AI+GnRH(ABCSG-12)•  Tam.5J.+GnRH5J.schlechteralsAI5J.+GnRH5J.beiPat.

nachadj.Chemotherapie(hohesRisiko)undprämenopausalenHormonwerten(SOFT/TEXT)

Perimenopausal•  2JahreTam->3JahreAI(IES031)•  3JahreTam->2JahreAI(IES031)•  5JahreTam->5JahreLetrozol(MA.17)

Adj.endokrineTherapieinderPrämenopause

EBCTCG,Lancet2005CuzickJetal.,Lancet2007

GnantMetal.,Lancet2011SverisdoHrAetal.,SABCS2010

DaviesCetal.,Lancet2013Jinetal.,JCO2012

BlissJMetal.,JCO2012Gossetal.,JNCI2005Gossetal.,JCO2008

GossPetal.,SABCS2009,#13FrancisPAetal.,NEJM2015

M.Thill

PaganiOetal.,oralpresentaTonASCO2014PaganiOetal.,NEJM2015FrancisPAetal.,NEJM2015

Adj.endokrineTherapieinderPrämenopause–SOFT-/TEXT-Studie-Studiendesign

RANDOMIZE

Tamoxifen+OFSx5y

Exemestane+OFSx5y

RANDOMIZE

Tamoxifenx5yTamoxifen+OFSx5y

Exemestane+OFSx5y

Tamoxifen+OFSx5yExemestane+OFSx5y

JointAnalysis(N=4690)

• Premenopausal• ≤12wksatersurgery• Nochemo

OR

• Remainpremenopausal≤8mosaterchemo

• Premenopausal• ≤12wksatersurgery• PlannedOFS• NoplannedchemoORplannedchemo

SUPPRESSIONOFOVARIANFUNCTIONTRIAL(N=3066)

TAMOXIFENANDEXEMESTANETRIAL(N=2672)

OFS=ovarianfunc0onsuppression

Enrolled:Nov03-Apr11

Medianfollow-up5.7years

M.Thill PaganiOetal.,NEJM2014

SOFT-/TEXT-Studie-DFS/OAS

M.Thill

SOFT-Studie–EndpunktederfinalenAnalyse(Chemotherapy-Kohorte)

FrancisPAetal.,NEJM2015

M.Thill

Adj.endokrineTherapieinderPostmenopause

EBCTCG,Lancet2005EBCTCG,Lancet2015

Metzger-FilhoOetal.,JCO2015DaviesCetal.,Lancet2013

GossPetal.,JCO2008GossPetal.,JCO2007

CuzickJetal.,LancetOncol2010BlissJMetal.,JCO2012

•  AIfür5Jahre •  PräferenzbeilobulärenKarzinomen(BIG1-98)

•  Sequen0elleTherapiefür5-10Jahre •  Tam→AI(2-5Jahre)*

•  AI(2-5Jahre.)*→Tam(PräferenzbeiN+Status) •  Tamoxifen20mg/dfür5-10J.

•  WahldesAIeingedenkderAI-Zulassunginder1stLineTherapie(Kombina0onmitBiologicals):•  Exemestan+Everolimus•  Letrozol+Palbociclib

*DauerderAITherapie≤5J.

M.Thill

5 Jahre

5 Jahre

2 Jahre

2 Jahre

5 Jahre

5 Jahre

3 Jahre

3 Jahre

2-3 Jahre

2-3 Jahre 2-3 Jahre

3 Jahre

3 Jahre 2 Jahre

3 Jahre

5 Jahre

2 Jahre

5Jahre

5 Jahre 5 Jahre

5 Jahre 5 Jahre

5Jahre

5 Jahre Bis 5 Jahre

5 Jahre

Tamoxifen

Anastrozol

Letrozol

Exemestan

Plazebo

BIG1-98

ATAC

IES

ABCSG-08

TEAM

MA.17R

aTTom/ATLAS

MA.17

5Jahre

5Jahre

Adj.endokrineTherapieinderPostmenopause-Studienauswahl-

M.Thill

0 5 10 15 200

15

30

45

%, CI

Dis

tan

t re

curr

ence

years

14% T1N0 (score=1)

22% T1N1-3 or T2N0

29% T2N1-3

41% T1N4-9

47% T2N4-9 (score=6)

PanHetal.EBCTCG,ASCO2016,#505

Rezidivrisikonach5-jährigerendokrinerTherapieadjus#ertanTumorgrößeundNodalstatus

M.Thill GossPetal,ASCO2016,#LBA1

Erweitertadj.endokrineTherapieMA.17RStudie–DesignundDFS(OASn.s.)

M.Thill GossPetal,ASCO2016,#LBA1

Erweitertadj.endokrineTherapie:MA.17RStudie–StudiendesignundkrankheitsfreiesÜberleben

M.Thill

Fehlende Therapietreue

Hershmanetal.,JCO,2010

M.Thill

Diskontinuität = Erhöhte Rezidivrate

Hershmanetal.,BreastCancerResTreat2011

M.Thill

GynäkologischeProbleme

M.Thill

VaginaleAtrophie–Östradiol0,03mg

BuchholzSetal.,Climacteric2015

M.Thill

lower (maximum 43.70 pg/ml) and occurred later (at6–8 h) after 4 weeks (visit C2, day 28) and at this visit half

of the subjects did not have at all any quantifiable con-

centrations of E3 (Table 1). The Cmax (Table 2) was sig-nificantly lower at visit C2 compared to visit E

(p \ 0.0001).

E3 levels (Table 3; Fig. 3) were below the LLOQ forall, except two subjects. One had a E3 serum concentration

of 22.3 pg/ml at C1, and one had E3 levels of 49.2 pg/ml

and 14.5 pg/ml at C1 and C2, respectively. The troughconcentrations for E2 and E1 were always below LLOQ.

There were no statistically significant changes of LH

and SHBG serum concentrations during treatment. Atvisit C2, FSH showed a scant, but significant decrease of

serum concentration compared to E (p = 0.025), but no

significant differences were observed at visits C1, C3, andC4.

VMI improved rapidly already after 2 weeks of treat-ment from 31 % at entry to 70 % at visit C1 (p \ 0.0001)

and to 72 % at the end of initial therapy, and was main-

tained until the end of maintenance therapy at 73 %(Fig. 4, panel a).

Maximum E3 levels inversely correlated with VMI

values at visit E and visit C2 (R2 = 0.62, Fig. 5), demon-strating that the maturing epithelium rapidly precludes

further E3 absorption after the initial therapy.

Another important efficacy variable was LBG. At thestudy entry, the majority of subjects had grossly abnormal

vaginal flora (LBG III, 81 %), the remainder being LBG

IIb (moderately disturbed). After the 28 days of therapy,almost complete normalisation of the vaginal flora was

observed (Fig. 4, panel b): it had become only slightly

disturbed (LBGIIa, 63 %) or normal (LBGI, 25 %). Furthersignificant improvements were observed during the main-

tenance therapy: at C4, the majority of women had a stable

and normal vaginal flora (LBGI, 69 %; p = 0.039).Vaginal pH showed statistically significant decrease

(Fig. 4, panel c) from entry (mean 6.0) to visits C1, C2, and

C4 (mean 4.4–4.6; p \ 0.001), and remained unchanged

thereafter during maintenance therapy.Clinical symptoms of vaginal atrophy like dryness,

soreness, and dyspareunia all improved during treatment.

Dryness and soreness improved dramatically from entry tocontrol visits (p \ 0.001), while statistical evaluation of

the improvement in dyspareunia was hampered by low

numbers. At entry, sexual intercourse was reported only by19 % of women, whereas 31 % reported intercourse at visit

C4 (p [ 0.05). The experience of vaginal dischargeincreased significantly from entry to C2 (p \ 0.01), and

then decreased to the end of treatment. Vaginal paleness

Fig. 3 Baseline/trough estrogen levels (PPS, n = 16)

Fig. 4 Vaginal characteristics during the entry and follow-up phasesof the study

376 Breast Cancer Res Treat (2014) 145:371–379

123

lower (maximum 43.70 pg/ml) and occurred later (at6–8 h) after 4 weeks (visit C2, day 28) and at this visit half

of the subjects did not have at all any quantifiable con-

centrations of E3 (Table 1). The Cmax (Table 2) was sig-nificantly lower at visit C2 compared to visit E

(p \ 0.0001).

E3 levels (Table 3; Fig. 3) were below the LLOQ forall, except two subjects. One had a E3 serum concentration

of 22.3 pg/ml at C1, and one had E3 levels of 49.2 pg/ml

and 14.5 pg/ml at C1 and C2, respectively. The troughconcentrations for E2 and E1 were always below LLOQ.

There were no statistically significant changes of LH

and SHBG serum concentrations during treatment. Atvisit C2, FSH showed a scant, but significant decrease of

serum concentration compared to E (p = 0.025), but no

significant differences were observed at visits C1, C3, andC4.

VMI improved rapidly already after 2 weeks of treat-ment from 31 % at entry to 70 % at visit C1 (p \ 0.0001)

and to 72 % at the end of initial therapy, and was main-

tained until the end of maintenance therapy at 73 %(Fig. 4, panel a).

Maximum E3 levels inversely correlated with VMI

values at visit E and visit C2 (R2 = 0.62, Fig. 5), demon-strating that the maturing epithelium rapidly precludes

further E3 absorption after the initial therapy.

Another important efficacy variable was LBG. At thestudy entry, the majority of subjects had grossly abnormal

vaginal flora (LBG III, 81 %), the remainder being LBG

IIb (moderately disturbed). After the 28 days of therapy,almost complete normalisation of the vaginal flora was

observed (Fig. 4, panel b): it had become only slightly

disturbed (LBGIIa, 63 %) or normal (LBGI, 25 %). Furthersignificant improvements were observed during the main-

tenance therapy: at C4, the majority of women had a stable

and normal vaginal flora (LBGI, 69 %; p = 0.039).Vaginal pH showed statistically significant decrease

(Fig. 4, panel c) from entry (mean 6.0) to visits C1, C2, and

C4 (mean 4.4–4.6; p \ 0.001), and remained unchanged

thereafter during maintenance therapy.Clinical symptoms of vaginal atrophy like dryness,

soreness, and dyspareunia all improved during treatment.

Dryness and soreness improved dramatically from entry tocontrol visits (p \ 0.001), while statistical evaluation of

the improvement in dyspareunia was hampered by low

numbers. At entry, sexual intercourse was reported only by19 % of women, whereas 31 % reported intercourse at visit

C4 (p [ 0.05). The experience of vaginal dischargeincreased significantly from entry to C2 (p \ 0.01), and

then decreased to the end of treatment. Vaginal paleness

Fig. 3 Baseline/trough estrogen levels (PPS, n = 16)

Fig. 4 Vaginal characteristics during the entry and follow-up phasesof the study

376 Breast Cancer Res Treat (2014) 145:371–379

123

lower (maximum 43.70 pg/ml) and occurred later (at6–8 h) after 4 weeks (visit C2, day 28) and at this visit half

of the subjects did not have at all any quantifiable con-

centrations of E3 (Table 1). The Cmax (Table 2) was sig-nificantly lower at visit C2 compared to visit E

(p \ 0.0001).

E3 levels (Table 3; Fig. 3) were below the LLOQ forall, except two subjects. One had a E3 serum concentration

of 22.3 pg/ml at C1, and one had E3 levels of 49.2 pg/ml

and 14.5 pg/ml at C1 and C2, respectively. The troughconcentrations for E2 and E1 were always below LLOQ.

There were no statistically significant changes of LH

and SHBG serum concentrations during treatment. Atvisit C2, FSH showed a scant, but significant decrease of

serum concentration compared to E (p = 0.025), but no

significant differences were observed at visits C1, C3, andC4.

VMI improved rapidly already after 2 weeks of treat-ment from 31 % at entry to 70 % at visit C1 (p \ 0.0001)

and to 72 % at the end of initial therapy, and was main-

tained until the end of maintenance therapy at 73 %(Fig. 4, panel a).

Maximum E3 levels inversely correlated with VMI

values at visit E and visit C2 (R2 = 0.62, Fig. 5), demon-strating that the maturing epithelium rapidly precludes

further E3 absorption after the initial therapy.

Another important efficacy variable was LBG. At thestudy entry, the majority of subjects had grossly abnormal

vaginal flora (LBG III, 81 %), the remainder being LBG

IIb (moderately disturbed). After the 28 days of therapy,almost complete normalisation of the vaginal flora was

observed (Fig. 4, panel b): it had become only slightly

disturbed (LBGIIa, 63 %) or normal (LBGI, 25 %). Furthersignificant improvements were observed during the main-

tenance therapy: at C4, the majority of women had a stable

and normal vaginal flora (LBGI, 69 %; p = 0.039).Vaginal pH showed statistically significant decrease

(Fig. 4, panel c) from entry (mean 6.0) to visits C1, C2, and

C4 (mean 4.4–4.6; p \ 0.001), and remained unchanged

thereafter during maintenance therapy.Clinical symptoms of vaginal atrophy like dryness,

soreness, and dyspareunia all improved during treatment.

Dryness and soreness improved dramatically from entry tocontrol visits (p \ 0.001), while statistical evaluation of

the improvement in dyspareunia was hampered by low

numbers. At entry, sexual intercourse was reported only by19 % of women, whereas 31 % reported intercourse at visit

C4 (p [ 0.05). The experience of vaginal dischargeincreased significantly from entry to C2 (p \ 0.01), and

then decreased to the end of treatment. Vaginal paleness

Fig. 3 Baseline/trough estrogen levels (PPS, n = 16)

Fig. 4 Vaginal characteristics during the entry and follow-up phasesof the study

376 Breast Cancer Res Treat (2014) 145:371–379

123

Wirksamkeit:Ultra-low-doseE30.03mgSystemisch?Lokal?

Donders G, …, Buchholz S. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2014) 145:371–379

M.Thill

EndokrineTherapiebeendigungwegenLebensqualitätsverlustbeivaginalerAtrophie15-20%-keingesteigertesKrebsrisiko

The Use of Vaginal Estrogen in Women With a History of Estrogen-Dependent Breast CancerABSTRACT: Cancer treatment should address female-specific survivorship issues, including the hypoes-trogenic-related adverse effects of cancer therapies or of natural menopause in survivors. Systemic and vaginal estrogen are widely used for symptomatic relief of vasomotor symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and lower urinary tract infections in the general population. However, given that some types of cancer are hormone sensitive, there are safety concerns about the use of local hormone therapy in women who currently have breast cancer or have a history of breast cancer. Nonhormonal approaches are the first-line choices for managing urogenital symptoms or atrophy-related urinary symptoms experienced by women during or after treatment for breast cancer. Among women with a history of estrogen-dependent breast cancer who are experiencing urogenital symptoms, vaginal estrogen should be reserved for those patients who are unresponsive to nonhormonal remedies. The decision to use vaginal estrogen may be made in coordination with a woman’s oncologist. Additionally, it should be preceded by an informed decision-making and consent process in which the woman has the information and resources to consider the benefits and potential risks of low-dose vaginal estrogen. Data do not show an increased risk of can-cer recurrence among women currently undergoing treatment for breast cancer or those with a personal history of breast cancer who use vaginal estrogen to relieve urogenital symptoms.

Recommendations and ConclusionsThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists makes the following recommendations and conclusions:

• Nonhormonal approaches are the first-line choices for managing urogenital symptoms or atrophy-related urinary symptoms experienced by women during or after treatment for breast cancer.

• Among women with a history of estrogen-dependent breast cancer who are experiencing urogenital symp-toms, vaginal estrogen should be reserved for those patients who are unresponsive to nonhormonal remedies.

• The decision to use vaginal estrogen may be made in coordination with a woman’s oncologist. Additionally, it should be preceded by an informed decision-making and consent process in which the woman has the information and resources to con-

sider the benefits and potential risks of low-dose vaginal estrogen.

• Data do not show an increased risk of cancer recur-rence among women currently undergoing treat-ment for breast cancer or those with a personal history of breast cancer who use vaginal estrogen to relieve urogenital symptoms.

Background Oncologic care providers are increasingly recognizing that cancer treatment should address female-specific survivorship issues, including the hypoestrogenic-related adverse effects of cancer therapies or of natural meno-pause in survivors. Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care providers frequently face the challenge of understanding and addressing these issues among an increasing cohort of women cancer survivors who experi-ence urogenital symptoms, either from cancer therapy or

COMMITTEE OPINIONNumber 659 • March 2016

Committee on Gynecologic PracticeThis Committee Opinion was developed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Member contributors included Ruth Farrell, MD. This document reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances as of the date issued and is subject to change. The information should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed.

The American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsWOMEN’S HEALTH CARE PHYSICIANS

The Use of Vaginal Estrogen in Women With a History of Estrogen-Dependent Breast CancerABSTRACT: Cancer treatment should address female-specific survivorship issues, including the hypoes-trogenic-related adverse effects of cancer therapies or of natural menopause in survivors. Systemic and vaginal estrogen are widely used for symptomatic relief of vasomotor symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and lower urinary tract infections in the general population. However, given that some types of cancer are hormone sensitive, there are safety concerns about the use of local hormone therapy in women who currently have breast cancer or have a history of breast cancer. Nonhormonal approaches are the first-line choices for managing urogenital symptoms or atrophy-related urinary symptoms experienced by women during or after treatment for breast cancer. Among women with a history of estrogen-dependent breast cancer who are experiencing urogenital symptoms, vaginal estrogen should be reserved for those patients who are unresponsive to nonhormonal remedies. The decision to use vaginal estrogen may be made in coordination with a woman’s oncologist. Additionally, it should be preceded by an informed decision-making and consent process in which the woman has the information and resources to consider the benefits and potential risks of low-dose vaginal estrogen. Data do not show an increased risk of can-cer recurrence among women currently undergoing treatment for breast cancer or those with a personal history of breast cancer who use vaginal estrogen to relieve urogenital symptoms.

Recommendations and ConclusionsThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists makes the following recommendations and conclusions:

• Nonhormonal approaches are the first-line choices for managing urogenital symptoms or atrophy-related urinary symptoms experienced by women during or after treatment for breast cancer.

• Among women with a history of estrogen-dependent breast cancer who are experiencing urogenital symp-toms, vaginal estrogen should be reserved for those patients who are unresponsive to nonhormonal remedies.

• The decision to use vaginal estrogen may be made in coordination with a woman’s oncologist. Additionally, it should be preceded by an informed decision-making and consent process in which the woman has the information and resources to con-

sider the benefits and potential risks of low-dose vaginal estrogen.

• Data do not show an increased risk of cancer recur-rence among women currently undergoing treat-ment for breast cancer or those with a personal history of breast cancer who use vaginal estrogen to relieve urogenital symptoms.

Background Oncologic care providers are increasingly recognizing that cancer treatment should address female-specific survivorship issues, including the hypoestrogenic-related adverse effects of cancer therapies or of natural meno-pause in survivors. Obstetrician–gynecologists and other health care providers frequently face the challenge of understanding and addressing these issues among an increasing cohort of women cancer survivors who experi-ence urogenital symptoms, either from cancer therapy or

COMMITTEE OPINIONNumber 659 • March 2016

Committee on Gynecologic PracticeThis Committee Opinion was developed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Member contributors included Ruth Farrell, MD. This document reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances as of the date issued and is subject to change. The information should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed.

The American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsWOMEN’S HEALTH CARE PHYSICIANS

M.Thill

Endometrium-CaRisiko

GrayRetal.,ASCO2013,oralpresenta0on

M.Thill

Endometrium“hyperplasie“unterTamoxifen

M.Thill

EndometriumveränderungenunterTamoxifen

•  Endometriumhyperplasie?•  Meistens

–  Gutar0ge(benigne)Polypen–  Wassereinlagerung(Ödem)desEndometriums/Myometriums

•  Wasistzutun?–  FallskeinevaginaleBlutungautril:ABWARTEN–  oder:diagnos0scheGebärmulerspiegelung(Hysteroskopie)undAusschabung(frak0onierteAbrasio)

–  Keinewiederholtenfrak0oniertenAbrasiones

M.Thill

Hitzewallungen

M.Thill

Akupunkturvs.VenlaflaxinzurBehandlungvasomotorischerSymptomebeiHR+Brustkrebs:EinerandomisiertekontrollierteStudie•  N=50•  12WochenAkupunktur(N=25)vs.12WochenVenlafaxin(N=25)•  NachdurchgeführterInterven0onsignifikanteVerbesserungder

HitzewallungenunddepressivenVers0mmungeninbeidenGruppen

•  ABER:Nach3MonatenLangzeitverbesserungnurinderAkupunktur-Gruppe

•  18vs.0AEs(Venlafaxinvs.Akupunktur)

Walkeretal.,JCO2010

M.Thill

Women With Early-

•  N=38•  Fragebogen(BriefPainInventory-Shortform(BPI-SF),WOMAC

(Osteoarthri0s-Index),M-SACRAGchronicrheumatoidaffec0onsofthehands

•  12xAkupunkturvs.12xShamAkupunkturen(oberflächlicheNadeleinführung)innerhalbvon6Wochen

•  Baseline,3und6Wochen•  SignifikanteVerbesserungderGelenkbeschwerdenund

GelenksteifigkeitinderAkupunktur-Gruppe

Walkeretal.,JCO2010

© AGO e. V. in der DGGG e.V. sowie in der DKG e.V. Guidelines Breast Version 2016.1D

www.ago-online.de

Oxford AGO LoE / GR

Ø  Soja – Isoflavonoide Hitzewallungen 1b B - Schlafstörungen 1b B +/- topische vaginale Applikation 1b B +/-

Ø  Rotklee-– Isoflavonoide Hitzewallungen und Schlafstörungen 1b B +/- (Aktivierung von MaCa-Zellen insbes. bei hormon-rezeptorpositiver Erkrankung nicht ausgeschlossen)

Ø  Leinsamen (40g/d) (bei HR+ ≤ 10g/d (1 Essl.)) 2b B +/- Ø  Traubensilberkerze gegen Hitzewallungen 1b B -

Traubensilberkerze und Johanniskraut als fixe Kombi 1b B +/- Ø  Johanniskraut-Produkte (in Kombinationstherapie) 1b B - -

(pharmakologische Interferenz mit endokriner Therapie, Zytostatika und Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitoren)

Ø  Ginseng Wurzel (Panax ginseng or P. quinquefolius) 1b B - Ø  Bromelain + Papain + Selen + Lektin 3b B +

(AI-induzierten Gelenkbeschwerden)

Bei laufender onkologischer Standardtherapie: CAVE Medikamenten-Interaktionen!

CAM-Therapie Postmenopausale Symptome II

© AGO e. V. in der DGGG e.V. sowie in der DKG e.V. Guidelines Breast Version 2016.1D

www.ago-online.de

Allgemeine Ansätze: Ø  Körperliches Training / Sport 1b B ++ Ø  Mind Body-Medizin 1b B +

(Yoga, Hypnose, Schulung, Beratung) Ø  Kognitive Verhaltenstherapie 1b B ++

Ø  Akupunktur Aromatase-Inhibitor induzierte Arthralgie 2b B + Hitzewallung 1b B + Depression 2b B +/- Angst, Schlafstörungen 3b C +/- (Keine Akupunktur in Tumorregion mögliche Zellstreuung)

Oxford / AGO LoE / GR

Postmenopausale Symptome III Komplementäre Therapien

www.ago-online.de

M.Thill

MuskuloskelevaleProbleme

M.Thill

Arthralgien(Gelenkbeschwerden)-Fakten

•  AIassoziierteArthralgie-  InklinischenStudien5-35%-  AußerhalbklinischerStudien>40%-  In2/3mitmoderatembisschweremSchweregrad

•  VerbesserungwährendderTherapie•  UnterbrechungderTherapiein25-40%•  AIassoziierteArthralgieisteinhäufigerGrundfüreinen

Therapiestopp

M.Thill

Amwich#gsten:BeratungvorTherapiebeginn

•  MitArthralgienassoziierteRisikofaktoren•  HormonersatztherapieinderAnamnese

•  40,6%vs.28,4%•  ChemotherapieinderAnamnese

•  37,8%vs.31,3%•  Übergewicht

•  BMI>30kg/m2vs.25-30kg/m2vs.<25kg/m2

•  37,2%vs.31,3%vs.31,0%•  TherapiemitAnastrozolvs.Tamoxifen

•  35,2%vs.30,3%

SestakI.LancetOncol,2008

M.Thill

EmpfehlungenzurmedikamentöseBehandlungAIassoziierterArthralgien

Jackischatal.,GeburtshFrauenheilk,2008

Präparat Einzeldosis TäglicheDosis

Paracetamol 125,250,500,1000mg 4000mg(8x500mg)

Ibuprofen 200,400,600,800mg 1600–2400mg(4x600mg)

Diclofenac 25,50,75,100mg 150mg(3x50mg)

Naproxen 250,500,750mg 1000mg(2x500mg)

Celecoxib 100,200mg 400mg(2x100mg–2x200mg))

Etoricoxib 30,60,90,120mg 60mg(1x60mg)

M.Thill IrwinMetal.,SABCS2013

M.Thill

Studiendesign

Mod.Irwin,SABCS2013

RecruitBreastCancerSurvivors(n=1537)

CheckEligibility(n=981)

TakinganAI(n=728)

BaselineVisits(n=121)

Randomize(n=121)

Exercise(n=61) UsualCare(n=60)

6-and12-MonthVisits(n=57)

6-and12-MonthVisits(n=49)

•  NoMDconsenttocontact(n=144)•  Unabletocontact(n=412)

•  NottakinganAI(n=253)

•  Noteligible(n=372)•  Notinterested(n=235)

M.Thill IrwinMetal.,SABCS2013

M.Thill

ChangeinWorstPainScore

Mod.Irwin,SABCS2013

M.Thill

SignifikanterKnochensubstanzverlustdurchTherapiedesMammakarzinoms

AdaptedfromHirbeetal.,ClinCancerRes,2006

1.0%2.0%

7.0%7.6%

2.6%

0

2

4

6

8

FrauenmitspäterMenopause

FrauenmitfrüherMenopause

AITherapie AI+GnRH OvarialinsuffizienznachCTX

LWSBMD

Abfallnach1Jahr,%

M.Thill

FrakturratenachAromatasehemmer-Therapie