Bernhard Kohl Integrative Planning of Rail Projects...Trans European Railway Project –“Building...
Transcript of Bernhard Kohl Integrative Planning of Rail Projects...Trans European Railway Project –“Building...
INTEGRATIVE PLANNINGOF RAIL PROJECTS
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan TischlerUniversität Innsbruck
Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard KohlILF Consulting Engineers Austria GmbH
Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietÖBB-Infrastruktur AG
Trans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges”Vienna, 18. October 2016
© ÖBB
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
2
I.INTRODUCTION
II.INTEGRATIVE PLANNING PROCESS –
PRINCIPLES FOR RAILWAY LINES
III.CASE STUDY –
SEMMERING BASE TUNNEL
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
3
Introductionwhy integrative planning?
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
4
DETAILED DESIGN &CONSTRUCTIONPHASE
GENERALDESIGNPHASE
PROJECTPREPERATIONPHASE
Project idea
Definition of scopeand objectives
Commissioning
Detailed design
Procurement
Construction
Feasibility study / conceptual design
Operation
Preliminary design
Preparation for permit application
Study of alternatives
In the first stage of the general design phase … most key decisions defining its
technical quality cost effects on environment are taken
actions to achieve public acceptance need to be taken
Introductionproject phases
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
5
Study of alternatives develop route alternatives evaluate alternatives against project targets compare alternatives in a multidisciplinary approach select “best solution”
Preliminary design: define technical features of rail project more in detail develop secondary structures and protective measures execute project optimization process to maximize
benefits & minimize costs & negative effects on environment
Introductionrelevant steps in the early planning phase
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
6
I.INTRODUCTION
II.INTEGRATIVE PLANNING PROCESS –
PRINCIPLES FOR RAILWAY LINES
III.CASE STUDY –
SEMMERING BASE TUNNEL
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
7
Integrative planning processinterplay between project team and stakeholders
alignment, review of proposedroute alternatives
discuss adjustment, additional proposals for alignments
requirements for route designspatial / environmental requests /
needs2 Route design
define planning process, project objectives & conditions
establishpublic consultation process1 Basis
PROJECTTEAM PUBLIC CONSULTATION
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
8
Integrative planning processstep 1 of route design:identifying relevant conflict zones
Integrative planning processstep 2 of route design and optimisation:design of route alternatives in a multidisciplinary process
BA
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
9
3
evaluation of route alternatives
consolidation of evaluation resultsand weighted criteria
alignment, review of proposedroute alternatives
discuss adjustment, additional proposals for alignments
identification and compilation ofdecision criteria
explain adjustment and define a setof decision criteria
requirements for route designspatial / environmental requests /
needs
Method
2 Route design
4 Evaluation
5 Recommendation
define planning process, project objectives & conditions
establishpublic consultation process1 Basis
PROJECTTEAM PUBLIC CONSULTATION
Integrative planning processinterplay between project team and stakeholders
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
10
I.INTRODUCTION
II.INTEGRATIVE PLANNING PROCESS –
PRINCIPLES FOR RAILWAY LINES
III.CASE STUDY –
SEMMERING BASE TUNNEL
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
11
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelinitial situation
The existing Semmering railway line is more than 150 years old and UNESCO cultural heritage
Not suited for modern rail traffic due to small radii, steep gradients, limited capacity and extensive maintenance requirements
A tunnel project developed in the 1980’s was rejected due to high impact on nature and public resistance
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
12
Case study New Semmering Base Tunneldevelopment of route alternatives
• Development of feasible route alternatives including different locations for a station
• Discussion and evaluation of alternative proposals
1. Step: Design of route alternatives
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
13
Case study New Semmering Base Tunneldifferent locations for linking the new tunnel with the existing line
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
14
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelthe 13 route alternatives of the new Semmering Base Tunnel project
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
15
Case study New Semmering Base Tunneldevelopment of route alternatives
• Development of feasible route alternatives including different locations for a station
• Discussion and evaluation of alternative proposals
1. Step: Design of route alternatives
2. Step: Evaluation of route alternatives
• Set of decision criteria,weighting of decision criteria
• Evaluation of route alternatives• Recommendation for decision making
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
16
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelhirarchical structure of set of criteria for route selection
main criterion 1.1main criterion 1.1
main criterion 1.2main criterion 1.2
main criterion 1.xmain criterion 1.x
SUBJECT AREA 1SUBJECT AREA 1
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
IND
ICAT
OR
S
sub criterion 1.1.1sub criterion 1.1.1
sub criterion 1.1.2sub criterion 1.1.2
sub criterion 1.1.xsub criterion 1.1.x
sub criterion 1.2.1sub criterion 1.2.1
sub criterion 1.2.2sub criterion 1.2.2
sub criterion 1.2.xsub criterion 1.2.x
sub criterion 1.x.1sub criterion 1.x.1
sub criterion 1.x.2sub criterion 1.x.2
sub criterion 1.x.xsub criterion 1.x.x
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
17
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelset of criteria / objectives for subject area transport and technology
subject area main criterion sub-criterion objective
transportand
technology
railway technology –infrastructure
route parameters compliance with route requirements
adjustment of other technical infrastructures minimization of expenses
operations control
performance high line capacity during standard operations
travel time minimization
energy consumption minimization
maintenance activities minimization of impairment during ongoing operation
exceptional operatingconditions
interruption of train movement and availability
minimization of number and effects of incidents, optimization of availability
construction phase minimization of impairment during ongoing operation
construction
ground conditions aiming at favourable groundconditions
material logistics sustainable materials management
construction time and execution of construction work optimization
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
18
In key aspects in line with project objectives, with relevant drawbacks in other aspects
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelclassification system for route evaluationabsolute approach – aimed on project objectives: required to guarantee comparability between different criteria
1
2
3
4
5 VERY GOOD
TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY / POSITIVE PERMIT PROCEDURE not guaranteed!
Completely in line with project objectives
GOOD
AVERAGE
…
…MODEST
Project objectives missed; in case of relevant benefits in other criteria acceptable
POOR
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
19
route alternativesobjectives / criteria
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelevaluation of feasible alignments
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
20
clear responsibilities the decision is taken by ÖBB as the project owner the decision is based on the results of the route selection process, taking
into account … the cost, the differences in technical benefits, the differences in environmental impacts the weighting of the individual criteria elaborated in the public
consultation process
method Cost-effectiveness analysis
putting the weighted benefits in relation to cost Sensitivity analysis
with different sets of weightings
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelprocess of decision making
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
21
Columns are representing the overall weighted sum of benefits per € of capitalized overall cost
Weighting set „balanced“
route alternatives
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelpocess of decision making – results of cost-effectiveness analysis
Weighting set „technology focused“
route alternatives
weighted (dark) / not weighted (light)
weighted (dark) / not weighted (light)
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
22
Case study New Semmering Base Tunneldevelopment of route alternatives
• Development of feasible route alternatives including different locations for a station
• Discussion and evaluation of alternative proposals
1. Step: Design of route alternatives
2. Step: Evaluation of route alternatives
3. Step: Design of secondary structures and protective measures
• Set of decision criteria,weighting of decision criteria
• Evaluation of route alternatives• Recommendation for decision making
• Design of protective measures for selected route alternative
• Decision / evaluation of alternative proposals• Finalisation of project as basis for permit
application
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
23
Essential elements of public consultation: Start process as early as possible Identify and involve all relevant interest groups and
stakeholders Structure process in manageable way
(working groups with limited number of participants –15-30 people)
Plan control and document discussion process –take advantage of independent moderation
Closely link discussion process with design process Accept and discuss all proposals,
answer all question thoroughly Include elements of active contributions Make process contents, and decisions transparent
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelimplementation of public interests in the design process
Semmering Base Tunnel: 12 Committee meetings
at regional level 23 Committee meetings
at community level (4 per community)
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
24
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelfurther steps – project overview
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
25
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelfurther steps – administrative procedures
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
26
Case study New Semmering Base Tunnelfurther steps – current status
Tunnel Gloggnitzunder construction
Tunnel Fröschnitzgrabenunder construction
Portal area Gloggnitzfirst part finished
Equipmentfrom 2024
Portal area Mürzzuschlagfrom 2019
Tunnel Grautschenhofunder construction
Source: all pictures © ÖBB
Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Stephan Tischler | Dipl.-Ing. Bernhard Kohl | Dipl.-Ing. Gerhard GobietTrans European Railway Project – “Building Bridges” // Vienna, 18. October 2016
27
Thank you for your attention!
© ÖBB/grafebner © ÖBB/grafebner
© ÖBB © ÖBB