l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

download l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

of 33

Transcript of l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    1/33

    The Joy of Being Dogmatic

    Karl Barth

    (1886 1968)

    Theology

    withoutCompromise

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    2/33

    Science orDogma?

    What does it mean to be

    scientific?

    What does it mean to be

    dogmatic?

    Are they compatible?

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    3/33

    Science orDogma?

    As a theological discipline, dogmatics is the

    scientific test to which the Christian Church puts

    herself regarding the language about God which is

    peculiar to her.

    . . . if theology allows itself to be called a science, it

    cannot at the same time take over the obligation to submit

    to measurement by the canons valid for the other sciences.

    Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    4/33

    Science orDogma?

    For medieval theologian, Thomas Aquinas, Christian

    Theology

    flows from founts recognized in the light of a higher

    science, namely Gods very own which he shares with theblessed. Hence, as harmony credits its principles which are

    taken from arithmetic, so Christian theology takes on faith

    its principles revealed by God.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    5/33

    Real Science

    Barth rejects the idea that modern

    science and rationality is value-free and

    objective. In fact it conceals an anti-Christian ideology.

    The true science of dogmatics must rest

    on principles which are God-given and

    secure.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    6/33

    Text

    Why does Barth think that theology

    deserves the name of science?

    Why does he think most of what we callscience is heathen?

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    7/33

    Enlightenment Themes (1)

    Descartes: we start with the certainty ofour own existence and build knowledge onthat

    Kant: we need to recognise that weactively shape the world, we are the oneswho make it knowable.

    Scientific Method: knowledge is based onpublicly available empirical evidence,backed up by experimentation.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    8/33

    Enlightenment Themes (2)

    Consequences:

    Dualism: dividing the world between facts

    and values; matter and spirit; knowledgeand faith

    Suspicion: questioning traditional

    authorities and superstition

    Optimism: Human rationality can fuel

    progress towards a better world

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    9/33

    Liberal Protestantism

    Accepts historical method, questions

    traditional doctrines

    Accepts validity of modern science Belief in gradual evolution of religious

    awareness

    Church part of wider brotherhood of man Historical figure of Jesus more important

    than doctrines about him

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    10/33

    World WarOne

    3 Oct. 1914 93 German intellectuals, among whom were

    almost all of Barths university theological teachers, to the

    scandalised Barth, signed a manifesto of support for Kaiser

    Wilhelm IIs German expansionism. The manifestodeclared:

    we believe that for European culture on the whole

    Salvation rests on the victory which German militarism,

    namely manly discipline, the faithfulness, the courage to

    sacrifice, of the united and free German nation will

    achieve.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    11/33

    Dialectical Theology

    If I have a system, it is limited to a recognition of what

    Kierkegaard called the infinite qualitative distinction

    between time and eternity, and to my regarding this as

    possessing negative as well as positive significance: Godis in heaven and thou art on earth.

    The Gospel is not a religious message to inform mankind of

    their divinity or to tell them how they may become divine.

    The Gospel proclaims a God utterly distinct from men.

    Karl Barth, The Epistle to the Romans

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    12/33

    Problems?

    If God is wholly other to human beings,how can human beings speak of God?

    If we need a special revelation from Godto speak of God, doesnt this underminethe doctrine of creation that we arealready made in Gods image?

    If revelation is historical, how can it avoidthe relativising effects of historicalcriticism?

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    13/33

    The German Christians

    We see in race, folk, and nation, orders of existence

    granted and entrusted to us by God. God's law for us is that

    we look to the preservation of these orders. Consequently,

    miscegenation is to be opposed. ... faith in Christ does notdestroy one's race but deepens and sanctifies it.

    In the person of the Fuhrer we behold the One sent from

    God who places Germany in the presence of the Lord of

    History.

    German Christian statements

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    14/33

    The Cross and the Swastika

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    15/33

    Text

    On what basis does the Barmen

    declaration reject Nazi ideology?

    What role is played by the ideas ofobedience, lordship and authority in this

    rejection?

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    16/33

    Barmen (1)

    The church in opposition to the world

    The Christian church is the community ofbrethren in which, in Word and sacrament,

    through the Holy Spirit, Jesus Christ acts in thepresent as Lord. With both its faith and itsobedience, with both its message and its order,it has to testify in the midst of the sinful world, asthe church of pardoned sinners, that it belongsto him alone and lives and may live by hiscomfort and under his direction alone, inexpectation of his appearing.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    17/33

    Barmen (2)

    We reject the false doctrine that the

    church could have permission to hand

    over the form of its message and of its

    order to whatever it itself might wish or to

    the vicissitudes of the prevailing

    ideological and political convictions of the

    day.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    18/33

    Religion is Unbelief

    All human religion is an attempt to grasp

    God on the basis of our distorted and

    sinful ideas and wills.

    Therefore all human religion is idolatry and

    unbelief (including Christianity, where it is

    not true to revelation).

    Can dialogue between religions be

    possible on this basis?

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    19/33

    Religion is Unbelief 2

    Revelation is Gods self-offering and self

    manifestation. Revelation encounters man

    on the presupposition and in confirmation ofthe fact that mans attempts to know God

    from his own standpoint are wholly and

    entirely futile.Church Dogmatics1/2, p. 301

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    20/33

    Religion is Unbelief 3

    In religion man bolts and bars himself

    against revelation by providing a substitute,

    by taking away in advance the very thingwhich was to be given by God . . .

    Revelation does not link up with human

    religion which is already present and

    practised. It contradicts it . . . .

    Church Dogmatics1/2, p. 303

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    21/33

    The Fall

    Barths alternative to the liberalism and

    nationalism he rejected depends on a

    strong doctrine of the Fall, ie, that all

    human striving after God apart from Gods

    revelation is bound to be sinful and

    destructive.

    Is this credible or justified? Whatobjections could be raised to it?

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    22/33

    Text

    What do you think the role of experience, historyand culture is in theology? Does Barth take themseriously enough?

    Do we need Barths stress on the Fall and Godsinitiative to cure us of false optimism, and theway we turn God into a projection of ourselves?

    How might Barths criticism of liberalism and

    religion be countered? How fair is it to associateliberalism with violence and war? Or otherreligions with idolatry and rebellion?

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    23/33

    Barth and Fundamentalism

    It is easy to caricature Barth as a fundamentalist.

    Do not forget:

    For Barth revelation is an event, a transformingencounter, not a static body of knowledge

    Barths theology is always worked out in conversationwith the thinkers and trends of his time

    Barths later work emphasises Gods (freely chosen)solidarity with humankind in Christ.

    Dogmatics is Church Dogmatics. For Barth, theology isalways done in the context of the Church the Biblecannot be interpreted apart from that context.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    24/33

    Church as Event

    The church is when it takes place that God lets certain

    people live as his servants, friends and children, the

    witnesses of the reconciliation of the world with himself as it

    has taken place in Jesus Christ, the preachers of thevictory which has been won in him over sin and suffering

    and death, the heralds of his future revelation in which the

    glory of the Creator will be declared to all creation as that of

    his love and faithfulness and mercy.

    Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    25/33

    Church nothing in itself

    This something which claims to be the church, and is

    before us all in these manifestations, may well be only the

    semblance of a church, in which human will and work,

    although they allege that they are occasioned andfashioned by God, are striving to express only themselves.

    What is visible in all this is only a religious society.

    It will always be in the revelation of God that the truechurch is visible.

    Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    26/33

    Questions

    Is Barths theology just for insiders for believers whoare already part of the Church? Why should anyoneoutside the Church take it seriously?

    If the Church is as flawed as Barth says, why is it given

    such a central role in his theology? Note the contemporary trend (Stanley Hauerwas,

    Radical Orthodoxy) to pit the Church against secularliberal society, and make it the necessary setting forChristian truth and practice. Is this a welcome return to

    an assertive theology or a defensive retreat inwards inthe face of an indifferent world?

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    27/33

    The Word of God (1)

    y The Word comes from God , not from us.We cant read it off our experience, orreason our way to it. It is not the same as

    the Bible, though the Bible contains andbears witness to it

    y The Word of God as directed to us is first

    ofallsuch a word as we do not speak toourselves, as under no circumstances wecould ever speak to ourselves.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    28/33

    The Word of God (2)

    y The Word is life and world changing.It speaks to us, here now, in theconcrete situation we are in. Its notjust abstract information about God.

    y the Word of God is, secondly, theWord which aims at and touches us inour existence.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    29/33

    The Word of God (3)

    y The Word restores our connection withGod. Christ takes upon himself ourrejection of God, and overcomes it.

    y the Word of God is in the thirdplace theWord which has become and doesbecome necessary for the renewal of the

    original relationship between us and Him.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    30/33

    The Word of God (4)

    y The Word reveals Gods own natureand self. It is personal. Christ is at theheart of the Trinity, the essence of

    Gods being. Hes not just a go-between!

    y

    the Word of God is fourthlyandfinally the Word by which Godannounces himself to man

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    31/33

    The Humanity of God

    Without retracting his earlier stress on Gods

    otherness and transcendence, Barth did

    later wish to correct its imbalance. The

    divinity of God must beheld together with

    Gods decision to be together with humanity,

    to make humanity, through Christ, his

    covenant partner: It is the divinity which as

    such has also the character of humanity.

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    32/33

    Concluding Thoughts

    Barth wrote of a revelation wholly unsullied by

    human ideology. But his own theology was

    shaped by the context and ideological conflicts

    of his day. For Barth, the Word of God is utterly sovereign.

    And yet it is most fully expressed in the historical

    human life of Jesus.

    Are these contradictions? Or creative tensions?

  • 8/8/2019 l2 Theh002 Cs1900 Barth

    33/33

    Barth in a Week

    http://faith-

    theology.blogspot.com/2005/11/church-

    dogmatics-in-week.html

    Selected readings and analysis compiled

    by Benjamin Myers

    Do not plagiarise this!

    Do not plagiarise this!