Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U.S. 25 (1963)
1
375 U.S. 25 84 S.Ct. 89 11 L.Ed.2d 43 Warren V. NICHOLSON v. Otto C. BOLES. No. 68, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States October 14, 1963 Warren V. Nicholson, pro se. C. Donald Robertson, Atty. Gen. of West Virginia, and George H. Mitchell and J. Patrick Bower, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. In light of the confession of error by the Attorney General and upon an examination of the record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia for further consideration. 2 Mr. Justice STEWART is of the opinion the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
-
Upload
scribd-government-docs -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
2
description
Filed: 1963-10-14Precedential Status: PrecedentialCitations: 375 U.S. 25Docket: 68, Misc
Transcript of Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U.S. 25 (1963)
375 U.S. 25
84 S.Ct. 89
11 L.Ed.2d 43
Warren V. NICHOLSONv.
Otto C. BOLES.
No. 68, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 14, 1963
Warren V. Nicholson, pro se.
C. Donald Robertson, Atty. Gen. of West Virginia, and George H.Mitchell and J. Patrick Bower, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals ofWest Virginia.
PER CURIAM.
1 The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ ofcertiorari are granted. In light of the confession of error by the AttorneyGeneral and upon an examination of the record, the judgment is vacated andthe case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia forfurther consideration.
2 Mr. Justice STEWART is of the opinion the petition for a writ of certiorarishould be denied.
