Selig

download Selig

of 5

Transcript of Selig

  • 8/12/2019 Selig

    1/5

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

    COUNTY OF

    NEW YORK

    TCR SPORTS BROADCASTING HOLDING, LLP,

    Petitioner,

    -against-

    W

    PARTNER, LLC; NINE SPORTS HOLDING,

    LLC; WASHINGTON NATIONALS BASEBALL

    CLUB, LLC; THE OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF

    BASEBALL; and ALLAN H BUD SELIG, AS

    COMMISSIONER OF MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL,

    Respondents,

    -and-

    THE BALTIMORE ORIOLES BASEBALL CLUB and

    BALTIMORE ORIOLES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

    in

    its capacity as managing partner ofT R SPORTS

    BROADCASTING HOLDING, LLP,

    Nominal Res ondents.

    Index No. 652044/2014

    (lAS Part 41)

    RESPONDENT THE OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER

    OF BASEBALL S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO

    PETITIONER S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

    Brendan

    V

    Sullivan, Jr.

    John J Buckley, Jr.

    Barry

    S

    Simon

    WILLIAMS CONNOLLY LLP

    725 Twelfth Street, N.W.

    Washington, DC 20005

    Tel: (202) 434-5000

    Fax: (202) 434-5029

    Attorneys for

    he

    Office

    of

    Commissioner of

    Baseball and Allan H Bud Selig, s

    Commissioner

    of

    Major League Baseball

    ILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2014 02:37 PM INDEX NO. 652044/

    YSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/

  • 8/12/2019 Selig

    2/5

    Respondent The Office

    of

    Commissioner

    of

    Baseball ( Commissioner )

    1

    submits this

    memorandum in opposition to the application for an order to show cause submitted by Petitioner

    TCR Sports Broadcasting Holding, LLP, d/b/a Mid-Atlantic Sports Network ( MASN )?

    MASN meets none

    of

    the requirements for a temporary restraining order. Most notably, there is

    and can be no irreparable harm to MASN as

    this is a dispute about money between fully solvent

    parties

    The threatened Notice ofTermination of which MASN complains can be

    extinguished immediately by

    MASN itself through the payment

    of

    amounts that MASN owes

    for 2014 to the Washington Nationals Baseball Club, LLC ( Nationals ), as the Commissioner

    already has directed MASN to do by August 6, 2014.

    In his letter of July 30, 2014, the Commissioner, exercising his powers under the Major

    League Constitution and other agreements that provided him authority to act, including the

    partnership agreement between MASN and the Nationals, directed MASN to pay the Nationals

    the amounts due for 2014. The Commissioner further directed the Nationals, upon receipt of

    such payments, to withdraw their Notice of Default dated May 30, 2014. The Nationals have

    represented that they will comply with the Commissioner's directive to withdraw the Notice

    of

    Default upon receipt

    of

    payment. The Commissioner's July 30, 2014letter further specified that

    if the interim amount that MASN is obligated to pay the Nationals for 2014 under the decision

    of

    the Revenue Sharing Definitions Committee ( RSDC )

    3

    is modified as a result

    of

    the pending

    1

    Respondent Allan

    H

    Bud Selig, as the Commissioner

    of

    Major League Baseball, joins this

    submission.

    2

    The Commissioner understands that a motion to seal the entire case file for this matter is

    pending, joins in that request, and submits this Memorandum with the understanding that it will

    be covered by the pending motion to seal.

    3

    The Commissioner did not order MASN, at this time, to pay to the Nationals the amounts due

    for 2012 and 2013. Nor did the Commissioner order MASN to pay the Orioles the amounts due

    under the RSDC's decision.

  • 8/12/2019 Selig

    3/5

    arbitration before the American Arbitration Association ( AAA ), the Nationals would be

    required to reimburse MASN for any overpayments, with interest. MASN's compliance with the

    Commissioner's directive would avoid all of the alleged problems of termination that MASN

    raises. Thus, even ifMASN were to succeed with its arbitral challenge to the RSDC's decision,

    the only harm

    MASN could suffer is a temporary economic loss that the wholly solvent

    Nationals can repay in full (with interest). As a matter oflaw, that is not irreparable harm. See

    e.g. EdCia Corp. v McCormack 44 A.D.3d 991, 994 (2d Dep t 2007) ( Economic loss, which

    is compensable by money damages, does not constitute irreparable harm. ). That principle is

    especially robust when, as here, there is no question concerning the defendant's ability to pay.

    See Rosenthal v Rochester Button Co. Inc. 148 A.D.2d 375, 376-77 (1st Dep t 1989) (denying

    injunctive rel ief because plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that defendant was in financial distress

    and likely to be unable to pay any future judgment).

    Moreover, even

    ifMASN

    did not make the interim payment prior to August 7, 2014 and

    the Nationals issued a Notice of Termination, MASN would still have the right to cure based on

    the underlying contract, and avoid termination of its broadcast rights. The contract permits

    MASN to cure any default predicated on the delinquent payment of rights fees by paying those

    fees, with interest, t any time prior to a court's final determination of the breach.

    Finally, MASN s petition to vacate is not properly before this Court because the March

    28, 2005 Agreement requires the parties to arbitrate any disputes that they may have. Section

    8.C. of that Agreement precludes MASN from raising before this Court its various challenges to

    the RSDC decision. Indeed, MASN has already invoked that arbitral process, and MASN' s

    arbitral claims encompass all ofthe issues that MASN seeks to bring before this Court. The

    AAA has started the process of organizing the contractually required mediation and, if necessary,

    2

  • 8/12/2019 Selig

    4/5

    arbitration that will resolve any remaining disputes. This Court is obligated to defer to those

    mandatory, unquestionably fair arbitration procedures. 9 U.S.C. 3; CPLR 2201 7503.

    MASN's petition to vacate is a waste

    of

    udicial resources and an ongoing violation of

    the Major League Constitution 's prohibition on litigation between

    or

    among Major League

    Baseball Clubs (like the Nationals and the Orioles) and Major League entities (like MASN and

    the Commissioner).

    See Major

    League Constitution, Art. VI. In any event,

    MASN

    is unlikely to

    prevail on its claims,

    even

    in the arbitral forum in which they are properly raised. MASN knew

    of all of the issues about

    which

    it now complains, either when it signed the March 28, 2005

    Agreement or

    in

    the

    more

    than

    two years between the initiation

    of

    the RSDC

    process-in

    which

    MASN admittedly participated-and the issuance

    of

    its decision. MASN has waived those

    claims. See Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

    v NY

    City Transit Auth. 82 N.Y.2d 47, 51, 55 (1993)

    (rejecting challenge

    to

    contractual ADR procedure that empowered an employee of one ofthe

    parties to resolve any disputes, subject only to limited review, and explaining that a party

    should not be able to slip

    out of

    the deal after it eventually found the [ADR] mechanism did not

    result in decisions favorable to it. ).

    Furthermore,

    MASN's

    bogus claims of fraud and corruption-all tellingly proffered

    upon information and belief' (Pet'n 13, 16, 71, 73}-have absolutely no factual basis.

    Indeed, MASN knowingly agreed to submit any dispute regarding the fair market value of the

    Nationals' television rights to the RSDC, which is a committee of three Club officials appointed

    by the Commissioner. The

    RSDC

    members were appointed by the Commissioner prior to the

    existence of this dispute. MASN has not (and cannot) set forth any facts that would support a

    finding that the RSDC members, who are officials of the

    New

    York Mets, Tampa Bay Rays, and

    Pittsburgh Pirates, respectively, had any bias

    or

    animus toward either Club in this dispute

    or

    3

  • 8/12/2019 Selig

    5/5

    MASN. But these are issues that cannot and should

    not

    be addressed in this forwn, and the

    Conunissioner will not do so during this manufactured emergency. The Court should deny the

    application and permit the governing dispute resolution process to run its course unimpeded.

    Dated: August 7, 2014

    Washington,

    D

    Pro hac vice

    application forthcoming.

    WILLIAMS CONNOLLY LLP

    B y : ~ / u < J

    Brendan V. Sullivan,

    Jr.

    John J. Buckley, Jr.

    Barry S. Simon '

    725 Twelfth Street, N.W.

    Washington, D 20005

    Tel: (202) 434-5000

    Fax: (202) 434-5029

    Attorneys for The Office ofCommissioner

    ofBaseball andAllan H Bud Selig, s

    Commissioner ofMajor League Baseball

    4