Status quo des 'Memorandum of Understanding' zwischen APMG und IPMA

Mag. Brigitte Schaden, IPMA Chairman

pma Vorstandsvorsitzende

Köln, 26. April 2012

• IPMA

• Komplexität in Projekten - Zertifizierungslevel

• Vergleichbarkeit von Standards

• Memorandum of Understanding APMG-IPMA

• Ergebnisse und aktueller Status

• Mapping von assessment Methoden

Information: IPMA

ExBo 2011/2012

IPMA Growth 1997-2010 (members)

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

118551330516251

1835822032 23553

2678029942 30290

32769

3818740785

53338 53655

IPMA‘s WorldAfrica

•Egypt•Marocco

•South Africa•Zambia

IPMA‘s World

Asia•Azerbaijan

•China•India•Iran

•Kazakhstan•Nepal

•Taiwan

IPMA‘s World

Australia

IPMA‘s World

Europe•Austria

•BosniaHerzegovina

•Bulgaria•Croatia•Cyprus

•Czech Republic•Denmark•Finland

•France (AFITEP)•France (SMAP)

•Germany•Greece•Hungary•Iceland•Ireland

Europe•Italy

•Kosovo•Latvia

•Lithuania•Netherlands

•Norway•Poland

•Portugal•Romania•Russia•Serbia

•Slovakia•Slovenia

•Spain•Sweden

•Switzerland•Turkey

•United Kingdom•Ukraine

IPMA‘s World

North America•Canada•Mexico

•United States

IPMA‘s World

South America•Brazil•Chile

•Costa Rica•Guatemala

•Panama•Peru

IPMA 4 Level Certification

Warum brauchen wir Standards ?

ISO_PC 236 Group photo at Paris plenary at AFNOR office January 2012 - (photo courtesy Jouko Vaskimo (JV7N0178))

The ICB 3

1.01 Project management success

2.01 Leadership 3.01 Project orientation

1.02 Interested parties

2.02 Engagement & motivation 3.02 Programme orientation

1.03 Project requirements & objectives

2.03 Self-control 3.03 Portfolio orientation

1.04 Risk & opportunity 2.04 Assertiveness 3.04 Project, programme & portfolio implementation

1.05 Quality 2.05 Relaxation 3.05 Permanent organisation

1.06 Project organisation 2.06 Openness 3.06 Business

1.07 Teamwork 2.07 Creativity 3.07 Systems, products & technology

1.08 Problem resolution 2.08 Results orientation 3.08 Personnel management

1.09 Project structures 2.09 Efficiency 3.09 Health, security, safety & environment

1.10 Scope & deliverables 2.10 Consultation 3.10 Finance

1.11 Time & project phases 2.11 Negotiation 3.11 Legal

1.12 Resources 2.12 Conflict & crisis

1.13 Cost & finance 2.13 Reliability

1.14 Procurement & contract 2.14 Values appreciation

1.15 Changes 2.15 Ethics

1.16 Control & reports

1.17 Information & documentation

1.18 Communication

1.19 Start-up

1.20 Close-out

The eye of competence

The purpose of the GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR

PROJECT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

initiative is to develop agreed frameworks as a

basis for review, development, and recognition

of local standards that will facilitate mutual

recognition and transferability of projectmanagement qualifications.

Mappings to Other Standards

As part of our work in the GAPPS to promote

transportability & mutual recognition, we mapped

various global standards to the GAPPS standards.

Based on the GAPPS standard this mapping

exercise is done to show which core and commonset of topics the various standards have.

Diversity of Standards for Project Management

ICB 3.0

PMBOK

OPM 3

IPMA-Delta

PM-Kanon

P2M

V-Modell XTPRINCE 2

DIN 69900 / 69901

ISO 10.006

HOAI VOB/FIDIC

Scrum

project excellence

CMMI

SPICE

special Standards

Maturity-Models

De facto Standards

De jure Standards

IEC 62198

VDA 4.3

……

ISO 21.500 ……

PM3

Up until now the following standards have beenmapped to the GAPPS standards:

• AIPM

• ANC SPM

• ICB3

• P2M

• PMBOK 2008

• PRINCE2 2009

• SAQA NQF Level 5

Memorandum of Understanding

• 11th November 2009, Vienna

The International Project Management

Association (IPMA) and The APM Group are

pleased to announce they have signed a Memorandum of Understanding which

will enable the two organizations

to support and recognise each other.

Brigitte Schaden, President of IPMA

Alan Harpham, Chairman, The APM Group

MoU OBJECTIVES• To publicise the mapping between ICB.3® and PRINCE2® as

developed by GAPPS and verified by IPMA® and APM Group.

• To encourage IPMA® members and PRINCE2 qualified people to research and write articles comparing and contrasting the ICB.3 and PRINCE2.

• To recognize that PRINCE2 provides knowledge and understanding of a number of the concepts included in the ICB.3 and in due course IPMA will develop supplementary exams to enable PRINCE2 Practitioners to achieve appropriate IPMA qualifications i.e. at levels C & D.

• To raise awareness of the IPMA member association's individual membership schemes among the APM Group's examination candidates.

• To bring the IPMA® member associations´ corporate membership

schemes to the attention of the APM Group's Accredited Organizations.

• ICB3 - PRINCE 2

PRINCE2-IPMA Syllabus

• “Upgradezertifizierung” von PRINCE2 – Practitioner zu IPMA Level D

• Syllabus

PILOT Project (Poland)

Pilot Project in Poland regarding Bridging Qualification from PRINCE2® Practitioner to IPMA® Level D certification

Start: London , Sept 5th 2011

• The groups for the pilot will be organized by the APMG Accredited Training Organizations

• Training before the session should cover all competence elements taken under consideration in Level “D” assessment.

• Pilot exams to be held in English only, Polish version plannedfor post-pilot

• 4 ATOs are participating in the pilot. 3-4 exam sessions of pilot exams to be organized in 2012

Suggested format of the upgrade certificate

2 written parts: A multiple choice test and an objective test exam

1. Multiple choice9 competence elements from technical competence elements

26 competence elements from contextual and behavioural

competence elements

Duration: 30 minutes

2. Scenario type questionsOTEs - Understanding and application level

Duration : 1 hour

Mapping of Global Certifications and Qualifications

GAPPS has pubished a mapping of the different assessment methods used for the various certificationsand qualifications for project management that are issuedby professional association and governments endorsedinstitutes such as universities and vocational educationproviders. ►

Never give up