DM UPDATE 2012

download DM UPDATE 2012

of 64

Transcript of DM UPDATE 2012

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    1/64

    Diabetes U

    Brian LaEndocrinology, DiabGessler C

    Winter HaveOffice: 863

    Email: brian.lake

    May 2

    pdate 2012

    ke, D.O.

    tes, and Metabolismlinic, P.A.

    , FL 33881 -294-0670

    gesslerclinic.com

    2012

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    2/64

    Financial

    Speakers bureau for:

    Byetta / Bydureon Lantus and Apidr

    Tradjenta (Boerin

    Synthroid (Abbott

    isclosures

    (Amylin)(Sanofi Aventis)

    er Ingelheim / Lilly)

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    3/64

    Obje

    Discuss the epidemiol

    Discuss the pathogeneprogressive disease

    ,glycemic goals

    Examine the AACE alg

    treatment Review newer diabet

    patients achieve goals

    tives

    gy of type 2 diabetes

    sis of diabetes as a

    ,

    orithm for diabetes

    s medications to help

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    4/64

    What is the scop of the problem?

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    5/64

    Facts onFacts on

    Of 311 million Americans, 26 mil

    An estimated 79 million America

    A condition that increases thdisease and stroke

    Diabetes more likely to affect ol

    2010

    Diabetes affects 8.3% of all Am20 and older

    Some 27% of people with dinot know they have the dis

    DiabetesDiabetes

    lion Americans have diabetes

    n adults have pre diabetes

    ir risk of type 2 diabetes, heart

    er Americans

    ricans and 11.3% of adults age

    betes 7 million Americans doease

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    6/64

    Estimated percentage oor older with diagnos

    diabetes, by age group,20

    3.7%

    .

    20-44 45-64

    Age Grou

    Source: 20052008 National Health and Nutrition Exa

    26.9%

    people aged 20 yearsd and undiagnosed

    United States, 20058

    65

    ination Survey.

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    7/64

    1,052,00

    Estimated number of ndiabetes among people a

    age group, Unit

    465,000

    20-44 45-64

    Age Gro

    Source: 20072009 National Health Interview Survey

    0

    w cases of diagnosedged 20 years or older, byed States, 2010

    390,000

    65

    p

    estimates projected to the year 2010.

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    8/64

    Diabetes Epidemiology 1956-2009

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    9/64

    Age-adjusted percentage of adults age

    2007

    MMWR 58:1259-1263, 2009

    d 20 years with diagnosed diabetes,

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    10/64

    Age-adjusted percentage of adults2007

    MMWR 58:1259-1263, 2009

    aged 20 years who are obese,

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    11/64

    40

    50

    60

    nt

    Total

    Non-Hispanic Black

    Estimated lifetime risk o

    individuals born in the

    0

    10

    20

    30

    Men

    Perc

    e

    Narayan et al, JAMA, 2003

    on-Hispanic White

    ispanic

    developing diabetes for

    United States in 2000

    Women

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    12/64

    The Big Picture 177 million worldwide

    4th leading cause of d India 33 million peopl

    Population of diabete

    2025

    One out of every threwill develop diabetes

    Time magazine Dece

    ith Type 2 DM

    eath by disease with diabetes

    wwill double to triple by

    Americans born today

    ber 2003; CDC

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    13/64

    So what have we lfew decades to hel

    arned over the lastattack to problem?

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    14/64

    Diabetes is a pro

    Two basic underlying

    2 diabetes: Insulin resistance

    Im aired insulin secreti

    pancreas

    gressive disease

    echanisms lead to type

    n from beta cells within the

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    15/64

    Diabetes is a pro

    Up to 70-80% of beta c

    time of diagnosis of typ Generally, alterations i

    been present for 5+ ye

    diagnosis of type 2 dia Newer therapies are be

    mechanisms of preservcell function and alterin

    1. DeFronzo RA. From the triumvirate to the otreatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus [Banting

    gressive disease

    ll function is lost at the

    2 diabetes1

    glucose handling havers prior to the laboratory

    etes ing targeted at

    ing and improving betainsulin resistance

    minous octet: a new paradigm for theLecture]. Diabetes. 2009: 58: 773-795.

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    16/64

    -Cell mass in

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0

    3.5

    e(%)

    -50%-50%

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    ND IFG

    b-Cellvolu

    Obese

    Butler et al. Diabetes. 2003

    ND=non-diabetic; IFG=impaired fasting glucose; T2DM

    ype 2 diabetes

    2DM ND T2DM

    Lean Type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    17/64

    The New

    DeFronzo RA. From the triumvirate to the omtreatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus [Banting

    Paradigm

    inous octet: a new paradigm for theLecture]. Diabetes. 2009: 58: 773-795.

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    18/64

    Knowing the scopeare we doing co

    of the problem, howtrolling patients?

    P t f P ti t With Di b t

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    19/64

    Percentage of PatiHaving

    80

    100

    US Adults With Diagno

    NHA

    73

    Percentat goal

    Harris MI, et al. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:403-408.

    0

    20

    40

    Diet alone Oral age

    38

    Therapy u

    nts With Diabetes 1C

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    20/64

    80

    90

    100

    en

    IRIS-Study (representative cohoin Germany): Proportion of patient

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    18 32

    %o

    fPatient

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    21/64

    16%

    Percentage of adultsreceiving treatm

    medication, Unit

    58%

    Insulin only Insulin and oral medicatio

    Source: 20072009 National Health Interview Surve

    12%

    with diagnosed diabetesnt with insulin or oral

    d States, 20072009

    Oral medication only No medication

    .

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    22/64

    What about the neminimal cardiova

    i.e. ACCORD, A

    er studies showingcular benefit with

    VANCE, VADT

    R l ti Ri k f i f

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    23/64

    Relative Risk ofDiabetic Complic

    11

    13

    15

    K

    DCCT Research

    1

    3

    5

    7

    6 7 8 9

    RELATIVER

    I

    Mean A1C

    rogression oftions - DCCT

    Retinop

    roup, N Engl J Med 1993, 329:977-986.

    10 11 12

    Neph

    Neurop

    Lifetime Be

    nefits of

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    24/64

    Lifetime BeIntensive Ther

    Gain of 15.3 years of cocompared to convention

    .

    conventional therapy

    DCCT Study

    nefits of py (DCCT)

    plication free livingl therapy

    Group,JAMA 1996, 276:1409-1415.

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    25/64

    DCCT

    10% reduction in HbA1

    43% reduced risk of re

    ncrease r s owith coma and/or seiz

    DCCT Research

    c

    inopathy progression

    evere ypog ycem are

    roup, N Engl J Med 1993, 329:977-986.

    L i A1CL i A1C d Ri kd Ri k

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    26/64

    Lowering A1CLowering A1Cof Complicatioof Complicatio

    (%)* 0

    -10-12

    United Kingdom ProsUnited Kingdom Pros(UK(UK

    *Percent risk reduction per 0.9% decrease in HbA1C;

    UKPDS. Lancet. 1998;352:837-853.

    Reductioninris

    =0.029

    p=0.0099

    p=0.052

    p=0.015

    p=0.0

    -20

    -30

    -40

    -50

    -25

    -3

    -21

    educes Riskeduces Riskss

    Any diabetes-related endpoint

    ective Diabetes Studyective Diabetes StudyDS)DS)

    00054

    endpoint

    MI

    Retinopathy

    Albuminuria at 12years

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    27/64

    Current recommendations addressmacrovascular disease with strict g

    ADA position statement2010 Standards of Care

    guideline

    ack of evidence of reduction inycemic control

    ADA Standards of Care. DiabetesCare 2010;33

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    28/64

    6.4% vs. 7.5%

    Sklyer JS, et al. Intentive glycemic control and the prevention of caDiabetes Care 2009;32:187-92.

    More advanced disease, in general, with av11 years.

    6.3% vs. 7.0% 6.9% vs. 8.5%

    rdiovascular events. A position statement of the ADA/ACC/AHA.

    erage time from diagnosis of DM2 of 8-

    ACCORD tudy 2008

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    29/64

    ACCORD tudy - 2008

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    30/64

    ACCORD s

    Halted after 3.5 years

    54 additional deaths in203)

    requiring assistance

    Increased weight gain

    We remain unsure of rdeath rate (possibly mreduction, hypoglycem

    ACCORD Study Group. Effects of Intensive2008; NEJM 2008 Jun 12; 358(24): 2545-59.

    tudy - 2008

    intensive group (257 vs.

    ,

    in intensive group

    asons for increasedgnitude or speed of A1c

    ia, adverse rxns, etc)

    lucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes. NEJM

    ADVANCE

    t d 2008

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    31/64

    ADVANCE

    Summary most patienand metformin

    Intensive glucose contr 10% reduction in com

    macrovascular event re uc on n m c

    21% reduction in nep No significant effects No significant effects

    cardiovascular mortality Consistent treatment

    subgroups

    ADVANCE Collaborative Group. IntensivOutcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabete

    study - 2008

    s on gliclazide MR (SU)

    l resulted in:bined, major micro- or

    ovascu ar even sropathy

    on macrovascular events on all-cause or

    effects in patient

    Blood Glucose Control and Vasculars. NEJM 2008; 358(24):2560-2572.

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    32/64

    VADT

    No statistically significcardiovascular events

    No statistically significmicrovascular events

    Increased risk of hypogroup (link found with

    Rosiglitazone used in72% of standard groufound with CV events

    Glucose Control and Vascular Complications2008 Dec 17.

    -2008

    nt effect onr death

    nt effects on

    lycemia in intensiveV events)

    5% of intensive andand no associationr death

    in Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes. NEJM.

    f f f

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    33/64

    Three large trials of glycemic controlCVD benefit

    Sklyer JS, et al. Intentive glycemic control and the prevethe ADA/ACC/AHA. Diabetes Care 2009;32:187-92.

    published in 2008 failed to find

    tion of cardiovascular events. A position statement of

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    34/64

    ADA Standards of Care. Diabetes CareJanuary 2012;35: Supplement 1

    2012 ADA guideline appropriatelydiscusses microvascular benefits of

    A1C < 7% while acknowledginglack of proven macrovascularbenefits at the A1C values that werestudied.

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    35/64

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    36/64

    2. Lipid recommendations in t

    diabetes

    ADA St

    pe 2

    ndards of Care; Diabetes Care, January 2011

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    37/64

    Conclusion: The combination of fenofibrate of fatal cardiovascular events, non-f

    with simvastatin alone.

    April 29, 2010 NEJM

    ate and simvatatin did not reduce thetal MI or non-fatal stroke, as compared

    ACCORD BP: Results

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    38/64

    ACCORD BP: Results

    Conclusions: In patients with type 2cardiovascular events, targeting a sysmmHg, as compared with less than 1

    fatal and nonfatal major CVD events.

    iabetes at high risk fortolic blood pressure of less than 1200 mmHg, did not reduce the rate of

    Conclusions:

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    39/64

    Conclusions:

    New clinical trial data has solidified cu A1C ~ 7% SBP ~ 130 mmHg LDLc < 100mg with statin (ACCOR

    Use of ASA in higher risk patients wit

    reduction: A1C < 7% SBP < 130 (ACCORD achieved 119 Addition of fibrate or niacin to statin t ASA should not be used if CVD risk

    rent treatment goals:

    lipid achieved 80 mg/dL)

    h diabetes

    mHg SBP)

    o target TG if LDLc already at goal

    s low

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    40/64

    Now that we k

    recommendationdoing globally, wha

    us get our pa

    ow the newer

    , and how we areis available to help

    ents to goa

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    41/64

    Standards of Medi

    Sta

    Dia

    doi:

    Publ

    chadiab

    al Care in Diabetes

    dards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2012

    etes Care January 2012 35:S11-S63;

    0.2337/dc12-s011

    ished yearly by the ADA in Diabetes Care

    ges in standard of care for patients withetes

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    42/64

    AACE/ACE DiabGlycemi

    A1c based algonewer therapies a

    in medications uba

    tes Algorithm forControl

    ithm addressingllowing for flexibility

    ilized. Evidenceed.

    AACE/ACE Diab

    tes Algorithm for

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    43/64

    AACE/ACE Diab

    Glycemi Permission granted for

    algorithm from the AmClinical Endocrinologis

    Algorithm available at:

    https://www.aace.com/iccontrolalgorithmppt.p

    Accessed 4/17/12

    tes Algorithm for

    Control electronic use of

    rican Association ofts.

    sites/degault/files/glycemdf

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    44/64

    What do we now h

    to glycemic goals,and help reduce ris

    comp

    ve to bring patients

    void hypoglycemia,of MICROvascular

    at ons

    Therapeuti Options for

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    45/64

    Therapeuti

    Type1995

    Sulfonylureas

    INSULIN

    Regular

    Ultralente

    Options for

    2 DM2012

    Sulfonylureas

    INSULIN

    NPH

    Meglitinides

    Incretin mimetics

    Amylinanalogues

    egu ar

    Insulin analogues

    Peak-less basalinsulins

    Metformin

    TZDs

    Alpha glucosidaseinhibitors

    n tors

    Bile Acid bindingsequestrants

    Bromocriptine

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    46/64

    DeFronzo RA. From the triumvirate to the omtreatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus [Banting

    inous octet: a new paradigm for theLecture]. Diabetes. 2009: 58: 773-795.

    N t i

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    47/64

    Newer t

    There is no one perfeceight currently acceptehandling

    Targeting glycemic go

    earlier in the disease preductions in risk

    Most newer therapies

    hypoglycemia and restsecretion

    erapies

    medication to attack alld defects in glycemic

    ls more aggressively

    rocess has durable

    re aimed at reducing

    oring endogenous insulin

    Current Oral Therapies DoDefects in Type 2 Diabetes

    ot Address the Multiple

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    48/64

    Defects in Type 2 Diabetes

    Impairedinsulinaction

    Inadegluc

    suppr(-

    dysfu

    Glucoseinflux from

    GI1 tract

    -Glucosidase TZDs2 unme

    48

    1 Gastrointestinal

    2 ThiazolidinedioneAdapted from DeFronzo RA. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis. 2003;3(

    n tors

    Metformin

    Plasma glucose an

    Sulfonylureas

    uategonssionellction)

    Chronic-cell

    decline

    Acute-cell

    dysfunction

    t need unmet need

    uppl 1):S24S40

    Glinides

    disease progression

    Incretin effect onIncretin effect on insulin secretion insulin secretion

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    49/64

    sulin(mU

    /l)

    80

    60

    40Incretin

    effect

    Control subjects (n=8)

    Nauck et al. Diabetologia. 1986

    Oral glucose loadIntravenous glucose infusion

    Time (min)

    I

    20

    0

    18060 1200

    sulin(mU

    /l)

    80

    60

    40

    People with Type 2 diabetes (n=14)

    Time (min)

    I

    20

    0

    18060 1200

    GLP-1: effe ts in humans

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    50/64

    After food ingestion

    GLP-1 is secreted from

    L-cells of the jejunumand ileum

    That in turn

    Drucker. Curr Pharm Des. 2001Drucker. Mol Endocrinol. 2003

    Stimulates glucose-dependent insulin secretion

    Suppresses glucagonsecretion

    Slows gastric emptying

    Long-term effectsin animal models:

    Increase of -cell massand improved -cell function

    Improves insulin sensitivity

    food intake

    GLPGLP--1 preserves h1 preserves h man islet morphologyman islet morphology

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    51/64

    Control

    and function in cand function in c

    Farilla et al. Endocrinology. 2003

    Day 1

    + GLP-1

    ltured islets in vitro ltured islets in vitro

    Day 3

    Day 5

    GLP 1 rece tor agonists

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    52/64

    GLP-1 rece

    Exenatide, Liraglutide

    Injectable medications tsupraphysiologic levelsexert their effects

    , ,

    Generally targets post-but exerts effects on fast

    Hypoglycemia is rare wi

    sulfonylureas or insulinCan perpetuate a weig

    Average of approximatreduction

    tor agonists

    hat allowf exogenous GLP-1 to

    randial glucose levelsing glucose as well

    thout concurrent use of

    t benefit

    ly a 1.5% HbA1c

    GLP 1 receptor a onists (negatives)

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    53/64

    GLP-1 receptor a

    Cost

    Potential for nauseaCases of pancreatitis rehemorrha ic and necroti

    C-cell hyperplasia seenblack box warnings for(with extended release p

    relevance in humans

    onists (negatives)

    ported (includingin

    in animal models withedullary thyroid cancerreparations). Unsure of

    GLP 1 athway

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    54/64

    GLP-1

    Endogenous GLP-1 isdipeptidyl peptidase-4 (matter of minutes

    DPP-4 enzyme inhibitio

    GLP-1 concentrations sttime in circulation allowi

    athway

    rimarily degraded by thePP-4) enzyme within a

    keeps endogenous

    ble for longer periods ofg it to exert its effects

    Inhibition of DPP 4 Inc

    reases Active GLP 1

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    55/64

    Inhibition of DPP-4 Inc

    Intestinal

    GLP-1release

    Meal

    Intestinal

    GLP-1release

    Meal

    c ve

    GLP-1

    DPinhi

    c ve

    GLP-1

    DPinhi

    Adapted from Rothenberg P, et al. Diabetes. 2000;4

    reases Active GLP-1

    GLP-1inactive

    P-4itor

    DPP-4

    GLP-1inactive

    P-4itor

    DPP-4

    (suppl 1):A39.

    DPP-4 i

    hibitors

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    56/64

    DPP-4 i

    Sitagliptin, Saxagliptin, Lin

    Decrease the rapid degrad

    to allow it to exert its effectsGenerally targets post-pran

    Generally a very tolerablepotential side effects

    Hypoglycemia rare without

    sulfonylureas or insulinWeight neutral

    hibitors

    gliptin

    tion of endogenous GLP-1

    longerdial glucose values with a

    rug class with minimal

    concurrent use of

    DPP-4 Inhibit r (negatives)

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    57/64

    DPP-4 Inhibit

    Cost

    Cases of pancreatitis rehemorrhagic and necroti

    Small HbA1c lowerin

    r (negatives)

    ported (includinging)

    ower ~0.5%

    DPP-4 therap ideal patient

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    58/64

    DPP 4 therap

    Patients with renal dysfmetformin as first line th

    In combination with metinto the diagnosis of dia

    Patients with multiple cavoid hypoglycemia

    Patients with post-pran

    (potentially as a substitu

    ideal patient

    nction or intolerant ofrapy

    formin, particularly earlyetes

    morbidities wishing to

    ial hyperglycemia

    e of a sulfolylurea)

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    59/64

    Other Topics in the News

    Pioglitazone and

    Bladder Cancer

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    60/64

    Pioglitazone and

    6/15/11 The FDA isspublic to inform them of

    of increased risk of blawho took pioglitazone f

    Increased risk based o

    27.5 excess cases of bl

    100,000 person-years fnever use of pioglitazo

    1. Lewis JD, Ferrara A, PengHedderson M, Bilker WB, Quesenber

    2. SDI, Vector One: Total Patient Tracker (TPT). January 2010-O

    Bladder Cancer

    ed a statement to thea possible association

    der cancer in patientsr >1 year (based on 5-yr

    dose and duration

    adder cancer per

    llow-up, compared toe

    yJr, et al. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:916-22.

    tober 2010. Data extracted 12-15-10.

    Pioglitazone and

    Bladder Cancer

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    61/64

    Pioglitazone and

    Also, epidemiologic stusimilar association of bl

    pioglitazone with incre

    FDA guidance is to not

    patients with active blawith caution in patientscancer

    1. US Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov

    Bladder Cancer

    y in France showingadder cancer with

    sing dose and duration

    use pioglitazone in

    der cancer and to usewith a history of bladder

    Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm259150.htm

    Sum ary

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    62/64

    Sum

    Diabetes is an epidemino signs of slowing

    AACE and ADA algorittoward achieving contr

    complications in our di A goal HbA1c of < 7%

    reduce diabetic microv

    ary

    problem that is showing

    ms can help guide usl and preventing

    betic patients emains a realistic goal to

    scular complications

    Sum ary

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    63/64

    Sum

    With ACCORD, VADT,showing minimal cardio

    intensive glycemic contadvanced disease, we

    Goals and therapies shdiscussed with patients

    evolve in our knowledgof diabetes

    ary

    and ADVANCE trialsvascular benefit of

    rol on patients withhould be cautious in this

    uld continue to beas we continue to

    of the care and control

  • 8/13/2019 DM UPDATE 2012

    64/64

    Questi ns???