10 Jahre Levosimendan bei akuter und chronischer Herzinsuffizienz

16
19.04.13 1 10 Jahre Levosimendan bei akuter und chronischer Herzinsuffizienz in Österreich: Was haben wir gelernt, wo stehen wir, was bringt die ZukunA [email protected] Akut dekompensiertes Herzversagen: Therapie 13,9 92,9 10,1 16,3 36,5 27,2 0 20 40 60 80 100 ASB-CPAP Diuretika Beta-Blocker Opioide IV-Nitrate IV Inotropika Nieminen et. al: EuroHeart Failure Survey II; European Heart Journal, 2006Nov;27:2725-36 Percent 9% 38% 34% 13% 6% Adrenalin Dobutamin Dopamin Levosimendan Noradrenalin Akut dekompensiertes Herzversagen: Inotrope Therapie Nieminen et. al: EuroHeart Failure Survey II; European Heart Journal, 2006Nov;27:2725-36

Transcript of 10 Jahre Levosimendan bei akuter und chronischer Herzinsuffizienz

19.04.13

1

10  Jahre  Levosimendan  bei  akuter  und  chronischer  Herzinsuffizienz  in  Österreich:  Was  haben  wir  gelernt,  wo  stehen  wir,  was  bringt  die  ZukunA  

 georg.delle-­‐[email protected]  

Akut  dekompensiertes  Herzversagen:  Therapie  

13,9

92,9

10,116,3

36,527,2

0

20

40

60

80

100

ASB-CPAPDiuretikaBeta-BlockerOpioideIV-NitrateIV Inotropika

Nieminen et. al: EuroHeart Failure Survey II; European Heart Journal, 2006Nov;27:2725-36

Perc

ent

9%

38%

34%

13%

6%

AdrenalinDobutaminDopaminLevosimendanNoradrenalin

Akut  dekompensiertes  Herzversagen:  Inotrope  Therapie  

Nieminen et. al: EuroHeart Failure Survey II; European Heart Journal, 2006Nov;27:2725-36

19.04.13

2

IV  inotropes  used  in  31%  of  AHF  paNents  with  iniNal  SBP>=100mmHg  compared  to  72%  use  in  paNents  <100mmHg  

86%91%

27%

47%

72%

31%

9% 6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

<100 mmHg (20% AHF) >100 mmHg (80% AHF)

IV Diuretics IV vasodilators IV inotropes SIMDAX

ALARM-HF : Sample =All AHF patients with specified initial SBP 5,009

Follath F et al. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:619-26

6% 5% 6%

15% 14%16%

0%

10%

20%

All AHF AdCHF De Novo Patient died (SBP >=100) Patient died (SBP <100)

Mortality  in  paNents  with  iniNal  SBP  >=  100  vs  <100mmHg:  ADCHF  vs  De  Novo  AHF  (cardiogenic  shock  excluded)  

ALARM-HF: 951(19%) patients with initial SBP < 100mmHg (648 ADCHF, 303 De Novo AHF)

Follath F et al. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:619-26

19.04.13

3

OR-1896

OR-1855

0.05µg/kg/min

0.1 µg/kg/min

Levosimendan

J Clin Pharmacol 2002;42:43-51

Hämodynamische  Effekte  

Levosimendan acute hemodynamic effects in pts with CHF

CI

SV

SVR

PCWP

Slawsky et al. Circulation 2000;102:2222-27

19.04.13

4

Inotropie  –  auch  bei  Stunning?  

Intracoronary Levosimendan enhances Contractile Function of Stunned Myocardium

Anesth Analg 1997;85:23-9

•  anästhesierte Hunde, n=9 •  5x5 min Perioden LAD Occlusion/ Reperfusion •  3 h Reperfusion •  Levosimendan 1.5 - 12µg/min über 10min •  Ultrasonic segment length transducers

Intracoronary Levosimendan enhances Contractile Function of Stunned Myocardium

Anesth Analg 1997;85:23-9

LAD Region

* p<0.05 vs 3h Reperfusion + p<0.05 vs 1.5µg/min Levo ++ p<0.05 vs 3µg/min Levo § p<0.05 vs drug vehicle

19.04.13

5

Levosimendan  Improves  Stunned  Myocardium  

 •  24  PaNenten  mit  PCI  bei  ACS  (23  STEMI)  •  Alle  PaNenten  TIMI  III  Fluss  •  Doppelblind  24µg/kg  Levosimendan  gegen  Placebo  (2:1)  •  Ventrikulographie,  PAC;    Baseline  -­‐  20‘  

Sonntag et al; JACC 2004 43, 2177-2182

Levosimendan  Improves  Stunned  Myocardium  No  of  hypokineNc  segments  

012

34

56

78

9

Baseline 20'

LevoPlacebonu

mbe

rs

P = 0.015

Sonntag et al; JACC 2004 43, 2177-2182

•  10  Pat.  mit  KHK  bei  geplanter  HK-­‐Untersuchung  •  Links-­‐,  Rechts-­‐  HK,  TTE,  BlutgasbesNmmung  aus  

Koronarsinus  •  Doppler  Guidwire  (FloWire)  •  Levosimendan  24-­‐µg/kg  IV  •  Messung:  Baseline-­‐15-­‐30  Minuten  

Levosimendan  and  Coronary  Hemodynamics  

Michaels et al. Circulation 2005;111:1504-1509

19.04.13

6

Levosimendan  and  Coronary  Hemodynamics  

Michaels et al. Circulation 2005;111:1504-1509

P = 0.04

P = 0.04

Levosimendan  und  diastolische  FunkNon  

Effects  of  Levosimendan  on  leA  ventricular  relaxaNon  and  early  filling  at  maintained  preload  and  aAerload  condiNons  aAer  

AorNc  Valve  Replacemet  for  AorNc  stenosis  

Jörgenensen et al. Circulation. 2008;117:1075-1081

19.04.13

7

Unterschied  zu  anderen  Inotropika  

Kersten JR et al. Anesth Analg 2000;90:5–11.

Myo

card

ial I

nfar

ct S

ize,

%

of a

rea

at ri

sk

11 ± 2 * 24 ± 2 24 ± 4

Control (n = 8)

Levo (n = 9)

Levo + Glyburide

(n = 10)

Glyburide (n = 10)

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

28 ± 4

*P<0.05 compared with control and withLevo+Glyburide

Dogs with 60 min LAD Occlusion

Myocardial  Infarct  Size  in  Dogs  

Tritapepe et al. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 198–204

Levosimendan  pre-­‐treatment  improves  outcomes  in  paNents  undergoing  coronary  artery  bypass  graA  surgery  

24 µg kg-1

Bolus

19.04.13

8

Levosimendan pre-treatment improves outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery

ICU LOS

Tritapepe et al. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 198–204

0

4

8

12

16

Placebo Levo

p < 0.0001

hour

s

Levosimendan pre-treatment improves outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery

p < 0.0001

Tritapepe et al. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 198–204

Levosimendan pre-treatment improves outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery

p < 0.007

Tritapepe et al. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 198–204

19.04.13

9

Klinische  Daten  

REVIVE  II:  MulNcenter  Placebo-­‐Controlled  Trial  of  Levosimendan  on  Clinical  Status  in  Acutely  Decompensated  Heart  Failure  

 

Packer M et al. Am Coll Cardiol HF 2013;1:103–11

010203040506070

Improved

Unchanged

Worse

LevosimendanPlacebo

p-value = 0.015

REVIVE II: Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Trial of Levosimendan on Clinical Status in Acutely

Decompensated Heart Failure

Primary Endpoint (6h + 24h + 5d)

%

Packer M et al. Am Coll Cardiol HF 2013;1:103–11

19.04.13

10

REVIVE II: Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Trial of Levosimendan on Clinical Status in Acutely

Decompensated Heart Failure

Packer M et al. Am Coll Cardiol HF 2013;1:103–11

BNP-­‐levels  

 p  <    0.001  

REVIVE II: Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Trial of Levosimendan on Clinical Status in Acutely

Decompensated Heart Failure

Packer M et al. Am Coll Cardiol HF 2013;1:103–11

HR  1.26  (95%  CI:  0.83  to  1.91)  ,  p  =  0.29  

REVIVE II: Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Trial of Levosimendan on Clinical Status in Acutely

Decompensated Heart Failure

Packer M et al. Am Coll Cardiol HF 2013;1:103–11

19.04.13

11

The SURVIVE Trial: Comparison of Dobutamine and Levosimendan on Survival in Acute Decompensated Heart

Failure

Mebazaa et al. JAMA. 2007;297:1883-1891

The SURVIVE Trial: Comparison of Dobutamine and Levosimendan on Survival in Acute Decompensated Heart

Failure

Mebazaa et al. JAMA. 2007;297:1883-1891

The SURVIVE Trial: Comparison of Dobutamine and Levosimendan on Survival in Acute Decompensated Heart

Failure BNP

Mebazaa et al. JAMA. 2007;297:1883-1891

P < 0.001

19.04.13

12

Plasma  B-­‐type  natriureNc  pepNde  reducNon  predicts  long-­‐term  response  to  levosimendan  therapy  in  acutely  decompensated  

chronic  heart  failure  

NYHA III-IV EF < 35% 0.1 µg/kg/min

Farmakis et al. Int J Cardiol 2010;139:75-9

87% sensitivity and 83% specificity.

0

20

40

60

afibhypotension

hypokalemia

headache

extrasystoles

The SURVIVE Trial: Comparison of Dobutamine and Levosimendan on Survival in Acute Decompensated Heart

Failure Adverse events

%

Mebazaa et al. JAMA. 2007;297:1883-1891

p= 0.05 p= 0.02 p= 0.01 p= 0.05

p= 0.48 Levo

Dobutamin

Levosimendan Infusion versus Dobutamine Trial

gleichzeitige ß Blockade

CO

1

1,3

0,8

0,5

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

1,4

med

ian

chan

ge in

CO

(L/m

in)

Levo Dobutamin

ohne ß Blocker

mit ß Blocker

p=0.01

Follath et al. Lancet 2002;360:196-202

19.04.13

13

Levosimendan Infusion versus Dobutamine Trial

gleichzeitige ß Blockade

PCPW

-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-10

med

ian

chan

ge in

PCP

W

(mm

Hg)

Levo Dobutamin

ohne ß Blocker

mit ß Blocker

p=0.03

Follath et al. Lancet 2002;360:196-202

The SURVIVE Trial: Comparison of Dobutamine and Levosimendan on Survival in Acute Decompensated Heart

Failure Patients with ß-blockers

European Journal of Heart Failure Supplements 2007; 6: 95

The  effect  of  levosimendan  compared  to  placebo  on  mortality  

Delaney A et al. Int J Cardiol (2008), doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.08.020

19.04.13

14

Delaney A et al. Int J Cardiol (2008), doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.08.020

The effect of levosimendan compared to dobutamine on mortality

0.75 (0.61 to 0.92)

The effect of dobutamine compared to placebo on mortality

Delaney A et al. Int J Cardiol (2008), doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.08.020

Landoni  G  et  al.  Crit  Care  Med  2012  

Metaanalyse: Levosimendan

19.04.13

15

„Add  on“  Wirkung  

Russ et al. Critical Care Medicine. 35; 2007:2732-2739

Dtsch  Arztebl  Int  2012;109:343-­‐51.  

19.04.13

16

Levosimendan…  

•  Inotropika  haben  weiterhin  Stellenwert  bei  der  Behandlung  der  akut  dekompensierten  Herzinsuffizienz  

•  Levosimendan  best-­‐untersuchtes  Inotropikum,  in  geeignetem  Sesng  Vorteile  gegenüber  Dobutamin  

•  Eine  KombinaNon  von  Levosimendan  mit  Katecholaminen  ist  möglich  und  kann  sinnvoll  sein    

•  Keine  Monotherapie  bei  hypotensiven  PaNenten    •  Bolus??  •  Stellenwert  beim  ACS?